Screen Shot 2019-0…
How sexist is crystal cafe? Anonymous 33158
Take the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory here: https://secure.understandingprejudice.org/asi/take
Do you suffer from internalized misogyny? I have this running theory that most woman on the internet are sexist to some extent, but feel free to prove me wrong. This inventory shows how you stack up against others who've taken the test. It isn't a perfect tool, but it's short and memeable as all online tests should be.
>pic related is my results
>>33158>entertaining this kiked, gay shit
There's even the star of David and a fag flag right there, Jesus Christ. Might as well ask a telemarketer whether you need homeopatics
>Hostile Sexism Score: 1.36
>Benevolent Sexism Score: 4.18
i hate how my views contradict so much. I enjoy when men are protective and very affectionate to their partners, a little paternal even. And I like being maternal to my partner. But I also recognize that mindset puts women at a disadvantage socially, and opens the door to strict traditional, gender roles, which is unfortunate.
I mean if a man isn't going to prioritize your safety over his in danger, like in the question, whats the fucking point of men
Which do you want more? It's better you decide on what you'd rather have, than be indecisive.
Hostile Sexism Score: 0.73
Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.91
so this is the power of being a turbo lesbian…
>Hostile Sexism Score: 1.27
>Benevolent Sexism Score: 0.91
This is embarrassing. I've always thought I was biased in favour of women but my first score is higher than most of CC's.
Fuck it, I gave it a go. Tbh most of the questions are loaded questions and not as simple as just answering with a 0-5 scoring system so not really an accurate reflection of your personal views imo. I mean like the questions about feminism etc. Feminism is a hugely wide scope and you get people who agree with second wave feminism but not necessarily third wave etc and there is no way to really answer them using that system.
Agreed. I gave up on it because I don't think questions like "should men cherish and protect women" or "should a woman be put on a pedestal by her man" are good indicators of sexism if the reverse is never asked. I think all people should mutually cherish, protect their partners, and basically put them on a pedestal (to a reasonable extent, because just as a result of being deeply in love you will see your partner as being incredibly special and important) but the test only allows you to answer for one side of the equation.
Hostile Sexism Score: 3.18
Benevolent Sexism Score: 2.09
Reality can be whatever I want. I'm honest here. If you don't know the answers for the perfect score then there's something wrong with you. This is sjw propaganda 101.
Why is this sexist?
Thank you, that was a very fun activity. I am surprised at my "Hostile Sexism Score" but I scored quite well on the other one.
Me too but this time honestly. It was a chore. half of the questions I had no stance on the subject because I don't know what people think, because i don't know enough people. I'm a basement dweller. I gave 2 and 3 in those cases. Other half was asking about my opinion. Opinions don't hurt people. Malicious intents do. This test was created in order to confuse normal people and make them hate this degeneracy even more.
>(1) No matter how accomplished he is, a man is not truly complete as a person unless he has the love of a woman. >(13) Men are complete without women. >(17) A good woman should be set on a pedestal by her man. >(20) Men should be willing to sacrifice their own well being in order to provide financially for the women in their lives.
What is this? Okcupid? That's material for dating website questionnaire. What you think about gender roles has nothing to do with sexism. Shit i just glanced at "sexism" on wikipedia. That's not a discussion subject for anonymous imageboard. All I'm gonna say is- stereotypical woman pisses in a sitting/squatting position. Call me sexist now.>>33162
Sorry for being blunt, but that's how I see it. Perhaps I took it too personal. Sorry. Just because I think women deserve good treatment doesn't mean I'm treating men any worse than women.
"If a man isn't going to prioritize your safety over his danger, what's the fucking point of men"
Oof. If you could go ahead and never interact with any of the guys I want to date, that would be fantastic.
This, I just want a bf for companionship. Not worried about that anon going after them because the guys I like are tiny and weak though.
On topic, I don't like this test since it's so general. I had to give weird partial answers to most of them since yes, some women do those shitty things. But I don't stereotype all women as doing them, obviously. Yet somehow that makes me sexist to acknowledge that some ladies do a nasty?
Abysmal. Should have worked misandry into it too. I'd probably score about equal on both since! Some people are garbage! Wow!
>>33379>Some people are garbage! Wow!
I'm not a gender studies major but I'm like 90% sure this would be called sexist.
Screen Shot 2019-0…
yeah you can game the results obv but I tried to be honest
A bit weird because I always assumed I had intense internalized misogyny.
I genuinely believe that women should be in charge of most things and that they're often not credited enough.
The whole description of benevolent sexism feels off to me, and something that I do not see in my own views.