"INDIVIDUALS WITH A CERVIX" Anonymous 56382
Why tf do i have to put up with crazy men pretending to be women again? I'm so sick of this "trans" stuff, if J.K Rowling can state this basic fact, so can I.
Trannies be like: “yeah but did you know that 0.00000001% of biological women have a genetic defect that makes them born without a cervix? So no, we can’t just say ‘women’”
Hello fellow individuals tips cervix
"fucked up-ovaries haver" and "uterus owner" is how we are supposed to talk about PCOS too
i give up
Well, I think the wording is for transmen as well this time so they don’t larp their way into getting stage 4 cervical cancer because being referred to as a biological woman for 30 minutes at the doctors office makes them sad. I’m not sure if this makes me feel better, but the concept makes me laugh devilishly.
In other news, did you know both trans need to check their shit? Guess they need more places to find reasons why medical transition for 9 year olds is super necessary and not child abuse.
>>56396>In other news, did you know both trans need to check their shit?
More than other people? Best reports I can find says everyone should start getting screened at age 50 tranny or not. The only article mentioning it specifical for trannies was because if you have .frankenweiner or a surgical gouge you may find a colonoscopy uncomfortable more than a normal person.
Why do they always try and force their labels on other people. Cis, terf, menstruator, individual with a cervix. Yet their whole movement is about accept their true selves. Wtf.
Why can’t they at least put “women and other genders with cervixes”. It’s still nonsense but at least it would only be degrading themselves instead of half the earth.
>>56410>Why can’t they at least put “women and other genders with cervixes”. It’s still nonsense but at least it would only be degrading themselves instead of half the earth.
Congratulations on feeling degraded so easily! I'll make sure to refer to your type as "brunettes and other women with hair" next time, for your particular sensitivity.
I do not agree with the ideology, but the way you put it results in "othering" where the assumed normal is presented and then the "other" that applies is added as an after note. To increase inclusivity, you start a race to the lowest common denominator, which leads to strange situations like this. Again, I do not agree with this line of thought, but it is a product of identity politics and encouraging diversity as a good thing in and of itself without considering the drawbacks.
>>56412>I'll make sure to refer to your type as "brunettes and other women with hair" next time, for your particular sensitivity.
My sensitivity for basic biology? whew
>>56396>I think the wording is for transmen as well this time so they don’t larp their way into getting stage 4 cervical cancer
I have as little pity for yaoi-drunk fujos as I do for pro-lifers, she-pimps, and any other type of handmaiden. If their dumbass man larp gets them cervical cancer, so be it. There are too many women who aren't delusional, who have actual problems in their lives who need medical information communicated to them in plain speech.
Looking at the US I am starting to think that maybe Hitler and Bin Laden made some valid points here and there
Someone needs to gas all of the trannies.
so nobody want to talk about the fact that hpv is now a a big (bigger) thing instead of bashing trannies ?
Hating on bewigged men is skinny and funny though.
>>56475>INSTEAD of bashing trannies
Fuck no, trannybashing is the absolute shit. But we can talk about the HPV thing, too. You know who spreads HPV? Trannies, who will fuck literally anything that holds still long enough and consider monogamy a form of oppression. Never fuck a dude who's got pronouns.
>>56410>their whole movement is about accept their true selves
same is true for Christians… if you share their definition of true selfhood. thing is, unconditional acceptance doesn't exist. accepting one framework for how identity works means rejecting others. you can advocate for contradictory rights at the same time, but you can't implement them at the same time. either kids have agency and can consent to hormone therapy and they have the right to make independent decisions, or they don't have that kind of agency and they have the right to be protected. either trans women are biological women and they should to be treated as women in every way, or trans women are not biological women and they should be treated differently under certain circumstances.
inclusion doesn't mean abandoning all standards so everyone can feel equally valid, it means re-negotiating standards to be fairer.
im all for tranny bashing but many have hpv now thats what the article is all about…
what should i do if i meet a cute guy but he had it once and tells me on a date … like wtf… he got it from a stacy years ago and she from a chad and chad from a tranny he hateraped.
What if the guy doesnt tell it, what if he doesnt even know it
what if i had it once and it lies now dorment but it cant be detected anymore ?
No need to worry about it, chances are that you've inherited it, most of the population is infected lmao
still leaves the problem that assigning agency to someone who doesn't have it and fighting to exert influence over peoples lives regardless of what they say can be really oppressive.
activism usually has specific political goals, it says it's about "liberation" but it's more about making people conform to a new ideal than giving individuals real choices.
>you're 9 years old, you can decide for yourself what gender you are. we, your allies stand up for your right to take hormone blockers.
>oh, you say you don't want to work as a physicist? must be false consciousness implanted into you by the system, I know where your real interests are, lemme help you with that.
wow, thanks a lot.