[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Message

*Text* => Text

**Text** => Text

***Text*** => Text

[spoiler]Text[/spoiler] => Text

Image
Direct Link
Options NSFW image
Sage (thread won't be bumped)

Use REPORTS. Posting 'Mods pls' achieves nothing.
Check the Catalog before making a new thread.
Do not respond to maleposters. See Rule 7.
Please read the rules! Last update: 09/13/2020

26d9415f3fa318b3cf…

Anonymous 66005

Does it really matter if my first bf isn't a virgin?

Anonymous 66006

>>66005
if you really like him it doesn't matter

Anonymous 66010

>>66005
Nah. As long as he does not cheat thats all that matters.

Anonymous 66011

He's going to suck in bed but he will also not have much confidence so you can train him right.

Anonymous 66014


Anonymous 66015

Virgins don't know how to hump correctly. So there's a lot of chances of it slipping out, needing to be readjusted and awkward angles.

Anonymous 66020

>>66015
This. He'll probably also cum super fast and then think sex is over.

Anonymous 66021

>>66015
>>66020
But like one of the anons above us said, you can just train him and practise.
I'd only want a virgin bf tbh. Not saying that OP should reject or judge her own bf for not being a virgin, though. It's her own decision to make.

Anonymous 66022

>>66020
yeah but if you have a pre-fucked bf they could still do that but think they're hot shit and wont change

Anonymous 66023

I think that is an answer you have to find for yourself. What age range are we talking about?

Anonymous 66050

>>66005
Sorta?
If he's not a virgin because he was a rake (man-whore), then that is obviously not good.
If it's because he had a previous serious relationship then that is acceptable.
Honestly both partners in a relationship should be virgins, sexual "experience" is a fucking meme. Why? Because the truth is that no matter what anyone says about being "over" their previous partners, no one can help but compare their current squeeze to their previous ones. I'm not saying that they're necessarily doing it with ill-intent, but the truth is that you will always carry a piece of a person you've slept with for the rest of your life, does that sound like something you want either of you to have to deal with? I'd hope not.

Anonymous 66051

virgins can't make you cum.

t. fucked 3 virgin guys

Anonymous 66053

>>66051
A lot of non-virgins will also not be able to make you cum

Most Males are too stupid to just rub a clit, virgin or not

Anonymous 66055

>>66051
Pls teach me how to be a virgin boy slayer too.

Anonymous 66058

>>66055
Not her, but I've also taken a few boy's virginites.
but it's really not that hard, guys want to fuck, virgin guys even more so, offer sex and they'll be willing to fuck.
Like all males

Anonymous 66065

>>66051
>Didn't tell them to go down on or use their hands on you before the finishing touch

That was your mistake not theirs to be fair. If he is the virgin your responsibility is to teach him.

Anonymous 66072

experience.png


Anonymous 66073

>>66065
Pretty much this
Its not that hard to grab a guy's hand, guide him to your clit and tell him to rub slowly and increase tempo over time

Of you don't teach a guy, he's going to be shit but think he's a sex god

Anonymous 66074

>>66073
>you don't teach a guy, he's going to be shit but think he's a sex god
99% of moids. And that's the problem, that and many other reasons is why I want them dead they get taught to not give a single fuck about us..
/rant over

Anonymous 66076

>>66074
I mean it goes both ways
If you give a horrible toothy bj, you'll probably think you're good at sucking dick if the guy doesn't tell you how to actually suck a dick

Anonymous 66098

14fe43516fa7c939f1…

>>66051
>fucked 3 virgins
>just mindlessly fucked them because gotta SPLOOSH
>blames virgins and not yourself for not teaching them how to love you properly

You only get the orgasms you deserve.

Anonymous 66104

1507913198942.jpg

>>66023
I don't have a bf yet but im a 26 year old virgin myself
>>66050
>Why? Because the truth is that no matter what anyone says about being "over" their previous partners, no one can help but compare their current squeeze to their previous ones. I'm not saying that they're necessarily doing it with ill-intent, but the truth is that you will always carry a piece of a person you've slept with for the rest of your life, does that sound like something you want either of you to have to deal with?
Yeah im afraid I would be constantly angry and jealous at him.

Anonymous 66115

>>66072
Yes the job market sucks, but why would I hire someone without any experience when there are plenty of people with experience looking for jobs? It's not a charity.

Anonymous 66119

>>66115
Lots of reasons.

There isn't always an unlimited supply of experienced people applying for your job. A person can only have 1 job at a time. Granted the sex/job analogy sort of breaks down here because a man CAN actually be in sexual relationships with multiple women at a time unlike a job. But then it just comes down to a matter of, would you really rather be side girl #14 for an experienced guy than have a virgin to yourself (who stops being a virgin after 1 time anyways). Besides that, there's also

Everyone starts with 0 experience. Every experienced guy only got to become experienced because at some point, a woman said "Sure I'll have sex with you even though you've never had sex before". If every woman had the same paradoxical "I won't have sex with any man unless he's had sex before" then humanity would go extinct.
Human beings are more than just the functions they perform. If a guy had lots of positive qualities is it worth it to turn him down solely because he'll be a virgin for 1 time having sex and then never again?
Having "experience" doesn't automatically mean a guy will be any good at sex. A guy might have had lots of sex before just by being hot or a smooth talker but that doesn't mean he's learned anything.
Having no experience also doesn't automatically mean a guy will be bad as sex either.
The guy with no experience might have more potential to be good at sex than the guy who's had it before, you'll never know if he never gets a chance.
What's so awful about a round of subpar sex anyways? It has no permanent consequences. I can't imagine how you would see this as a major problem unless you're someone who has constant 1 night stands with different guys and then never sees them again and you just don't want your 1 night with this particular guy to be boring.

Anonymous 66147

464D06D5-97A7-4006…

>>66098
Absolutely based. Blaming only men is being intentionally ignorant. You need to teach, otherwise youre a failure of a partner

Anonymous 66160

>>66010
This.

Anonymous 66197

>>66119
Considering the perceived stigma against male virginity, I think most men wouldn’t mention their experience until after the couple falls in love.

Anonymous 66202

>>66197
my ex bf told me he was a kissless virgin with we met only after we broke up. we dated for 2 years. he had a made up story about losing his virginity. it was an embarrassing one, so no one doubted him, i believed him too.

Anonymous 66203

I guess it’s okay if he’s a virgin, but I’d be cautious about being a guy’s first long-term gf. I feel like guys’ first relationships, or just first relationships in general never really last and work more as a learning experience.

Anonymous 66221

1506673566576.gif

>>66005
As long as you don't get deadly STDs like AIDS and he doesn't sleep around like a typical fuckboy.
But if you're worried about purity or something related to that, then you should be able to date an Amish guy or something since most men are not pure whatsoever–even if they're virgins.



[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]