[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Message

*Text* => Text

**Text** => Text

***Text*** => Text

[spoiler]Text[/spoiler] => Text

Image
Direct Link
Options NSFW image
Sage (thread won't be bumped)

Janitor applications are open


Check the Catalog before making a new thread.
Do not respond to maleposters. See Rule 7.
Please read the rules! Last update: 04/27/2021

0610b7b79735315ef4…

Anonymous 71333

what does having a bf feels like?

Anonymous 71336

>98% of men watch porn
There's your answer

Anonymous 71338

>>71336
What percentage of women watch porn?

Anonymous 71340

figure1-14-w640.pn…

>>71338
Smaller than men, that's for sure. And porn affects men and women differently.

Anonymous 71345

>>71333
It feels like having another person you can rely and confide in. If standards are really high, it might even be nice and useful to have them around.

Anonymous 71348

>>71340
The fact that casually dating is the category with the lowest porn use among women is fascinating. Also
>The Institute for Family Studies (IFS) is a conservative "think tank" which, according to its website, has the expressed mission "to strengthen marriage and natural family and advancing the well-being of children through research and public education."
not a good source.

>>71336
Shouldnt it be 98% of men have watched porn at some point in their lives? I find it hard to believe that 98% are regular watchers.

Anonymous 71410

Nobody on this board is worth listening to on the subject, find a cute boyfriend and see by yourself

Anonymous 71412

>>71410
Partners are for people that are too boring to have a fulfilling life by themselves so they need someone that has committed to being with them forever so they can feel safe. Get a pet.

Anonymous 71426

It's nice, but it doesn't solve any other issues. I have a bf but I still feel lonely because he doesn't replace a solid friend circle. There are things you'll want to speak to a friend about, not a bf. But I like having the assurance that someone's always there for me and I'm their top priority, and I like being someone's designated go-to person too. Of course that only works if you're dating someone you can be great friends with.

Anonymous 71427

>>71426
>It's nice, but it doesn't solve any other issues. I have a bf but I still feel lonely because he doesn't replace a solid friend circle. There are things you'll want to speak to a friend about, not a bf.
Personally I disagree with this part. I don't feel like I need anyone else as my bf is my best friend. Any bf issues I want to discuss without him I can post online. There is the problem that if we broke up that I'd have no one left in my life, however I'm happy to take that gamble. I'm pretty introverted which might be the reason for the difference.

Anonymous 71428

It's nice but it's important to be okay on your own too. I took time off from dating for a year before my current relationship and I think that made me more independent and not as needy. It also made me less tolerant to BS so I was more selective during the talking phase. I think that's why having a bf now is nice for me. In my opinion, it's better to be single than with a shit man.

Anonymous 71709

>>71333
Well I like to put it in terms of mother and fatherhood. One side of it is like having a father again. He's big and strong; protects you, fixes shit, and cares for you. His voice is deeper than yours and he can pick you up and throw you if he wanted. You can cuddle up into his chest and arms and he's all warm, and makes you feel safe.

The mother side is like having a son. He turns to you for emotional comfort and he lets his guard down around you when you're alone together. You see what he's like when he's not around his friends. You cook for him and you get to see him eat your food so fast there's sparks flying off the inside of the bowl. When he's sleepy you can cuddle his head on your lap while you read or surf the internet.

These examples are what comes to mind from my experience, but obviously they're not complete. Just snapshots to fit the framework I'm using to explain it. The essence of mother and father do encapsulate the experience quite well, I think.

Anonymous 71711

>>71709
Gross.

Anonymous 71779

>>71712
Emotionally and mentally handicapped? What gave that impression? Cause I like to cook for him or is it that to receive emotional comfort makes you emotionally retarded somehow.

I don't need anyone larger than me for anything, I could call someone and pay them if I needed something done but sometimes I just wanna ride on his shoulders. It's not a matter of need, it's just nice to have a boyfriend.

Anonymous 71781

>>71712
I think some people just like caring for others when they like them, anon. So for those people it's not emotional labour.
Not defending pickme trawaifus who say you need to be the breadwinner, maid, and fuckdoll. But I have liked people (my mom, friends) in the past and like hearing about their woes and helping them and shit. Feels good and is returned in healthy relationships.

Anonymous 71785

having a bf is pretty annoying. i feel like i'm always making sacrifices for him and prioritizing time with him, and he can't bother to do a single thing for me and always puts me last. i no longer date that asshole but i've had the same experience with other moids. i feel disillusioned with dating and relationships.

Anonymous 71789

>>71709
This is so fuckin gross, unbelievable. Are you straights ok? Jesus christ, get therapy.

>and throw you if he wanted


Like, killing you? Do you glamourize being with someone who has the strength to KILL you?

Anonymous 71790

>>71789
I honestly think this is the mentality of most straight women. I could never buy into this whole "sisterhood" bullshit part of feminism because it's clear I have nothing in common with those women except for female reproductive system. Our goals and mentality will never be even slightly similar.

Anonymous 71794

>>71789
Your father could have killed you if he wanted, and probably still can. Does that make him a bad person or do you find comfort in his strength.

Would you rather me with someone weaker than you? If so wouldn't that make you the monster for being stronger than them?

Anonymous 71795

>>71790
Thank you based anona
You said really well. We're fundamentally different

Anonymous 71797

tumblr_inline_psy3…

This is the perfect embodiment of Oedipus complex and Freud shit

You're like: comparing A DAD to a male who you fuck, maintain intimacy and live 24/7 with. This is craaaazy, girl.

>Does that make him a bad person

lmao any male is a potential bad person, dads included.

Obsessing over how a male can pick you up and 'throw you when he wants' is like the ultimate defeat of self-preservation. Years of evolution for THAT
I get genuinely sad, lmfao

>Would you rather me with someone weaker than you? If so wouldn't that make you the monster for being stronger than them?


christ

Anonymous 71798

>>71794
>do you find comfort in his strength
No
Let's be honest, women only "needed" moids to protect them from other moids. So moids being agressive rapist freaks are the main problem. It's a problem that literally creates itself.
I'd rather live with no men in my private space at all. 58% of female victims of murder die from the hands of their male partners or family members (step sons etc.)

Anonymous 71806

>>71798
Even in a world without danger I'd still find comfort in the fact that my partner is strong, male or not. It'd be the same as being afraid of your father cause he's bigger and stronger than you. Makes no sense unless he's abusive.

> 58% of female victims of murder die from the hands of their male partners or family members

Yes but most victims of murder die from the hands of someone close to them, partner or family.

Anonymous 71810

>>71797
>This is the perfect embodiment of Oedipus complex
I'm choosing to frame it in the way of father and mother cause I think it's accurate, that doesn't mean I have an oedipus complex it's just the archetype behind the relationship is very similar.

>any male is a potential bad person

yeah any person is a potential bad person but that doesn't address the point I was making. There will be one person stronger than the other in any relationship and you have the choice of resenting it, or finding comfort in it (and more), and to be comforted by their power is a better approach than to fear or resent it.

>obsessing over how a male can pick you up… is like the ultimate defeat of self-preservation

You're the one that's obsessed, I listed it as one factor of what a relationship with a man is like and somehow you take that to mean I'm absorbed by this one thing. I never said I'd give up should a fight come to it or that I can't fend for myself. You're inferring far more than I've implied.

>>71809

>most of the offenders are male
I know, I just didn't see the point of getting specific about the statistic when it doesn't add anything. It's like saying blacks are potential thiefs when all men are potential thieves given different circumstances.

>most men aren't adept fighters or defenders

Yeah that's definitely true, but that's simply true across the board in any field of expertise. This is the same reason I brought up the murder thing earleir, how does it add anything to get specific about something like this. It's never the case that most men/women/asians/teenagers,etc, are skilled at (insert learned skill)

Anonymous 71820

>>71806
>It'd be the same as being afraid of your father cause he's bigger and stronger than you
No because in a relationship with a parent I'm literally the child and they have to take care of me, but with my partner I'm an adult. How can you even compare this. It's gross…

Anonymous 71823

>>71806
>Yes but most victims of murder die from the hands of someone close to them, partner or family
But female partners and female family members are not responsible for over a half of male deaths. It's about the fact that being in a straight relationship is WAY more dangerous to a woman than to a man.

Anonymous 72012

>>71823
I've actually heard something about there being a higher incidence of abuse in lesbian relationships, but maybe I heard it wrong…

Anonymous 72023

>>72012
You hetties really like to spread misinformation huh?

>The survey found that same-sex cohabitants reported significantly more intimate partner violence than did opposite-sex cohabitants. Among women, 39.2 percent of the same-sex cohabitants and 21.7 percent of the opposite sex cohabitants reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by a marital/cohabiting partner at some time in their lifetime. Among men, the comparable figures are 23.1 percent and 7.4 percent (exhibit 8). At first glance, these findings suggest that both male and female same-sex couples experience more intimate partner violence than do opposite sex couples. However, a comparison of intimate partner victimization rates among same-sex and opposite-sex cohabitants by perpetrator gender produced some interesting findings: 30.4 percent of same-sex cohabiting women reported being victimized by a male partner, whereas 11.4 percent reported being victimized by a female partner. Thus, same-sex cohabiting women were nearly three times more likely to report being victimized by a male partner than by a female partner. Moreover, opposite-sex cohabiting women were nearly twice as likely to report being victimized by a male partner than were same-sex cohabiting women by a female partner(20.3 percent and 11.4 percent) x

>Dishonest Journalists have spun this study to suggest that lesbian relationships are more violent than heterosexual or gay male relationships because 39.2% of women who have lived with women have experienced domestic violence. However, 11.4% report being victimized by a female partner, and 30.4% of women who have lived with women report being victimized by a male partner. The difference (20.3% vs 30.4%) suggests that either bisexual women are more likely to experience violence, OR, bisexual women who experience violence are more likely to date women then a bisexual women who has not experienced violence.
source for data: Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey

Women here cry about comphet but then forget that many lesbians dated men at some point in their lives, before coming out kek.
Also, most domestic violence against bisexual women is being committed by male partners, around 89.5% of bisexual participants who’d experienced such violence said the only perpetrators had been male. That's from a study conducted by the CDC in 2010

But yeah, dating scrotes is better than dating women.

Anonymous 72024

IMG-20201220-WA009…

>>72023
>You hetties really like to spread misinformation huh?

anything but admitting that fucking males willingly is like playing russian roulette, lol

Anonymous 72074

>>71709
don't mind the others, this is great.

Anonymous 72078

>>72074
How old are you?

Anonymous 72086

>>71789
>women only "needed" moids to protect them from other moids.
Animals, nature, illnesses?

Anonymous 72087

>>71709
Stop, this is too cute

Anonymous 72090

>>72086
>Animals

Moids make women more vulnerable to animal attack, being dumb and arrogant and going out of their way to provoke animals.

>nature


I'd rather have a roof than a man in a thunderstorm.

>illnesses


Women are objectively better at medicine than men.

Anonymous 72094

Just don't seem ri…

>>72090
>there are no dangers outside of men

Anonymous 72095

>>72094
>shifting the goalposts

Lots of things are dangerous besides men. Men don't protect against them. Men often exacerbate those dangers.

Anonymous 72101

>>72095
How do you square our evolutionary history, anthropology, and contemporary history with the belief that men don't protect us against danger.

You know how fast a pregnant woman can run? You think we'd have been able to outrun predators and defend ourselves without men? Such a braindead belief, men literally only exist to protect us, compete, and have us pick mates off the top of the pile.

Anonymous 72106

>>71333
It's like having a really good friend. Ignore the lesbians.

Anonymous 72107

>>72106
Yeah anon, the only women who shit on dating men are lesbians, sure (not)
I'm bi and dating men is retarded. I'm pretty sure most women who shit on dating men are also bi. I even knew a few straight women who decided to live without men and their lives are better that way. But continue to tell yourself and others you need men to live.

Anonymous 72110

>>72101
>you'd think we'd have been able to outrun predators

Men cannot outrun predators. They especially can't do it while carrying a pregnant woman, which I promise you they did as rarely as possible.

>and defend ourselves


Our defense against predators hasn't changed in thousands of years: we stay close in groups in shelter that has visibility, keep watch, keep fire, and keep dogs. This prevents most encounters. Men left women behind to go hunt predator species - such protection! Really makes you swoon.

Anonymous 72111

>>72101
>men literally only exist to protect us, compete, and have us pick mates off the top of the pile
They also exist to rape and kill us if we don't want to obey them, and also breed us to death like they did in the past, after giving brith to 12 kids. No wonder women lived even shorter than men in ancient Greece (not counting Sparta).
Yeah I'd prefer the whole humanity to die out. And thank god, we're getting there. Slowly but surely. Civilization built on the subjugation of women does not deserve to exist.

Anonymous 72120

>>72112
>You're just lumping all men together based on what you read online
No, based on my own experiences, the experiences of the women I know, statistics, studies, history AND reading women's stories online.
Also, I've never been to a coffee shop and I don't use twitter. Kys normie / scrote / both.

Anonymous 72125

>>72110
There's no way in hell you think I meant men would protect us by outrunning predators while carrying us. That's the most ridiculous shit I've ever heard. Not that they'd be meatbags for predators or keep them occupied while we ran, or killed them but they ran while carrying us? You're a real smart one you know that.

>hunting predators isn't protection

You're wrong. It's exactly killing predators that makes men valuable for the sake of protection whether by offence or defence, and whether that be raptors, snakes, felines, or other men. Also you're retarded if you think all men left to hunt.

Anonymous 72127

>>72023
You are so full of shit its hilarious,
"Taken together, the recent empirical evidence since the publication of past reviews
indicates that SSDV affects one quarter to nearly three quarters of LGB individuals (Blosnich
& Bossarte, 2009; Carvalho, Lewis, Derlega, Winstead, & Viggiano, 2011; Messinger, 2011;
Stephenson et al., 2010). These prevalence rates are similar to slightly greater than OSDV rates."(Stiles-Shields, C., & Carroll, R. (2014). Same-Sex Domestic Violence: Prevalence, Unique Aspects, and Clinical Implications. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2014.958792
)
So Same-Sex Domestic Violence is just as likely as Opposite Sex Domestic Violence or more. Moreover while gay relationship are more likely to report verbal abuse, lesbian ones are more likely to report physical or violent ones (Messinger, A. M. (2011). Invisible Victims: Same-Sex IPV in the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(11), 2228–2243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510383023
). We should try to solve this problem rather than denying it, and you are not helping.

Anonymous 72128

You are so full of shit it's hilarious
"Taken together, the recent empirical evidence since the publication of past reviews
indicates that SSDV affects one quarter to nearly three quarters of LGB individuals (Blosnich
& Bossarte, 2009; Carvalho, Lewis, Derlega, Winstead, & Viggiano, 2011; Messinger, 2011;
Stephenson et al., 2010). These prevalence rates are similar to slightly greater than OSDV rates."Stiles-Shields, C., & Carroll, R. (2014). Same-Sex Domestic Violence: Prevalence, Unique Aspects, and Clinical Implications. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2014.958792
SSDV being Same Sex Domestic Violence opposed to Opposite Sex Domestic Violence
Morover gay relationship are more likely to report verbal abuse while lesbian ones are more likely to report physical or sexual ones (Messinger, A. M. (2011). Invisible Victims: Same-Sex IPV in the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(11), 2228–2243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510383023).
We should try to solve this problem together, and you are not helping.

Anonymous 72130

498212c8a211e62e83…

>>72128
sorry I double posted

Anonymous 72136

>>72133
Cannot be truly sympathetic are you implying he did time for you hitting him?
You really did an awful thing but you are not who you were and better hope you are not.

Anonymous 72137

>>72133
You should become a lesbian, you will fit in well with them.

Anonymous 72142

>>72125
>there's no way in hell you think I meant what I said

Sorry, my fault for thinking you were being genuine.

>or keep them occupied while we ran


You keep saying things that make it obvious you don't know anything about wild animals. They don't choose targets based on point values. They pick weak prey and move to isolate them. If humans scattered when we saw scary things, we wouldn't be having this discussion. We'd have gotten our shit wrecked and some other animal would have invented image boards instead.

Further, early women were not stupid giggly idiots who were too busy making eyeshadow out of berries to learn how to operate a pointy stick. We do not now and never have needed men to kill. Group behavior does the heavy lifting, tool usage cleans up the rest.

Anonymous 72144

>>72121
>wanting your boyfriend to give you a home, car and job
Um okay. Your post isn't any better than the other "fucked" posts in this thread.

Anonymous 72180

>>72128
>my study is better than your study
Ok
>Behaviorally “bisexual” respondents experience the highest IPV rates and are most likely to be victimized by an opposite-sex partner.
Case closed. Stay mad hettie.

Also, men kill their female partners more often than lesbians kill theirs. Women still pay the HIGHEST price for being with men.

Anonymous 72182

It's exactly like having a best friend and if it doesn't feel like that, you're doing it wrong sorry.

Anonymous 72185

>>72182
Best friends don't feel entitled to your body, like most men do. Cope.

Anonymous 72187

>>72185
I obviously have sex with my bf, yes lmao but I think you've missed my point.

Anonymous 72188

>>72185
well you're entitled to his body as well, that's what a relationship is you're sacrificing the possibility of other people for each other.

>>72142
>We do not now and never have needed men to kill
You vastly underestimate the strength, speed, and agility difference between trained men and women, cause that gap becomes greater with training not lesser. Being less neurotic and more disagreeable also helps men kill more easily.

Anonymous 72191

>>72188
It doesn't matter I'm "entitled" because I wouldn't have the power (or desire) to pressure him into having some sort of sexual activity, men do have this power.
And they do this shit quite often:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-50546184
Disgusting. Just don't say it's uncommon when it affects more than a third of women.

Anonymous 72192

a55.png


Anonymous 72197

>>72188
>men kill more easily

True! And irrelevant. We don't need them to do that job. The cost outweighs the benefits.

Anonymous 72198

>>71789
This post is so funny.

Anonymous 72199

>>72191
just lift and find one of those weirdos who have an adversion to food lmao.
Honestly if you can get twenty or so more pounds of muscle then him then he should be pretty easy to overpower.

Anonymous 72200

>>72199
The fun part of this is that men don't want to date women who are stronger or even taller than them.
Can't live with them.
>inb4 imageboard weirdos tho!!
Huge gamble, likely as into little girls as they are amazons.

Anonymous 72202

>>72200
>men don't want to date women who are stronger or even taller than them.
This is a generalization. Generalizations apply to the average.
So you just need to find a deviation from the average.
He might have some edges to rough out (skin, hair, fitness), but it shouldn't be a problem to help him with that (So long as you secure permanent commitment, relationships are an investment not a charity).
And honestly him being into little girls is a concern with all men no matter how few men are considering the severity it.
So that's something you would have to vet for regardless (install programs to record his incognito history since most pedos use 2-D "technically legal" porn).
Bit of an invasion of privacy though.

Anonymous 72205

>>72197
Absolutely wrong, all men are capable of violence and very few of us are. They were designed to kill animals and each other which is why they're less empathic than we are and a most of them can switch off their emotions when something happens, if you've ever seen a man get violent you know the dead look in their eyes. Not only are we worse at violence, most women are incapable of violence, and we don't want to kill. Men are the opposite on all of those factors.

You're also underestimating the skill, talent, and strength required to kill animals with spears. A lot of hunting was done with thrown or drawn weaponry like spears or bows which require a lot of strength. Low poundage bows won't kill unless you can hit a moving animal right in the eye and neither will a spear thrown by a woman. Out of a 100 women picked randomly how many can throw a baseball faster than the average man? It's zero.

Anonymous 72207

tumblr_pe6vzkUiE21…

>>72202
>>72200
>>inb4 imageboard weirdos tho!!
Bastian Schweinsteiger is married to Ana Ivanovic though. She's only a little bit taller than him but she's still very tall.

Anonymous 72213

>>72207
Nothing wrong with dating shorter moids if they are cute. I would love to.

Anonymous 72225

>>72207
She's taller but she really doesn't look stronger than him.
Bad example since athletes are typically stronger than the average moid.

Anonymous 72227

>>71412
say hi to your cats for me

Anonymous 72229

>>71412
Moids count as pets. I'll get pet moid alright.

Anonymous 72230

>>72207
God I wish that was me

Anonymous 72233

>>72227
nta but don't say hi to your porn addicted scrote for me

Anonymous 72244

it's like having your best friend around all the time, except you can also have sex with them

Anonymous 72246

>>72244

Ya, this. It's nice.

Anonymous 72583

>>71338
Women don't watch porn, they read it.

Anonymous 72589

>>72583
This is true. I schlick it to AO3 m/m slash fics.

Anonymous 72596

>>72589
extremely patrician behavior

Anonymous 72609

>>72205
We don't live in the hunter gatherer age anymore anon, better weapons exist now. Almost no one still hunts with bows or spears.

Anonymous 72637

>>72609
anon claimed though that we never needed men

Anonymous 72638

>>72205
>most women are incapable of violence, and we don't want to kill

We don't want to kill each other. We are perfectly capable of killing animals and we always have been. Squeamishness about killing animals is a post-industrial phenomenon. Our great-grandmothers knew damn well where dinner came from. They broke the birds' necks themselves.

>You're also underestimating the skill, talent, and strength required to kill animals with spears


You're underestimating strength in numbers and overestimating how often we need to kill large animals in the first place.

>>72637
And I stick by that.

Anonymous 72639

>>72638
But anon women are soft sweet empathetic flowers who could never harm a cute fuzzy little animal without crippling lifelong guilt, how could this be?

Anonymous 72645

>>72639
It's due to the bad influence of moids that some women harm animals. Once moids are gone women will lose this violent tendency and live in harmony with nature with our feminine energies.

u w u

Anonymous 72653

>>72645
Unironically this

Anonymous 72664

>>72645
That's unironically what people thought about the violence of apes, come to find out that's just what they're like.

Anonymous 72669

>>71798
>Let's be honest, women only "needed" moids to protect them from other moids.
Looks like someone has never stepped outside of their nice upper middle class suburb.

Anonymous 72728

>>72669
Moid spotted

Anonymous 72878

>>72728
>a feelgood thread that isn't about obsessively hating moids (which is fucking 90% of the rest of this board)
>it gets fucking blasted by the pinkpillers who dehumanise men while claiming women have more empathy and are superior
>a few girls on here call you pinkpillers out on it
>"fucking moid detected!"
Goodness, it's like i'm scrolling a woman hate thread on 4chan, you girls really are cancer like your scrote counterparts, obsessive, spiteful, convinced of your own superiority just because you fuck other women. You're all disgusting. I wouldn't be surprised if moids came out of the walls to insult you then walk away with a worse opinion of women if they saw what you girls post.

Anonymous 72879

Chaos timeline.jpg

>>72728
>It is inherently male to believe dangers exist outside of men

Anonymous 72899

>>72878
>>72879
The anon you're talking to is definitely a victim of abuse by moids.
I know that, because I used to harbor the same feelings, it takes a long to accept that it won't happen again only because you trusted a man, and that not all men are evil. It took me finding a loving bf to let go of all that.
Also it requires dropping the ego. I can admit now that I love feeling protected by him.

Anonymous 72903

>>72878
>feelgood thread

Since when is tfwnobf "feelgood"? If anything, it's feelgood now that OP knows she's not missing out on anything.

Anonymous 72905

>>72903
The discussion is about what having a boyfriend is like, not necessarily tfwnobf. It's the minority of posts here anyhow that deem having a boyfriend in a bad light

Anonymous 73236

I want to watch movies and cuddle up to a boy, but I'm too ugly and awkward to ever live that fantasy.

Anonymous 73260

>>71789
This is really, very, sad. What leads to this sort of mindset? And why is the only way to express that mindset through a heap of cliches you stole off reddit?

Anonymous 73261

>>72023
Is this board actually full of political lesbianism tier shills, or is this some joke going over my head?

Anonymous 73262

>>72107
I think lots of the people who spout that kind of rhetoric (read "FDS") are just angry that they can't find a "good" partner. It all reads like the inverse of incels.

Anonymous 73312

>>73262
Good old shoehorn theory, I'm always impressed at how it is proven true again and again

Anonymous 73316

>>73260
What's wrong with what she said? Serious question.
She exaggerated a little but isn't it kind of strange that many straight women desire a "big strong guy" who can "pick you up and throw you"? It's like, are they really looking for a partner or do they want a father figure/replacement? Why are they okay with cohabiting with someone who can overwhelm them physically?

Anonymous 73317

I have never had a boyfriend and it makes me sad. I hate men. I’m so lonely. I wish I were a lesbian. That disgusts me. I’m going to be alone forever. Now I understand single women who adopt their way into single motherhood. I will be like Mary but instead of the evil male God I will have Venus in my heart. There are women who have boyfriends and vivaciousness and are happy. Why couldn’t that be me? Why why why

Anonymous 73318

>>73317
you sound utterly unhinged, get some help.

Anonymous 73319

>>73318
Shut up moid, males are the unhinged ones. You will never know serenity because your DNA makes you behave like an ape.

Anonymous 73320

>>73319
>wa wa i wish i was lesbian grr i hate moids they fucking ruin everything, yeah schizo schizo god gods women moids grr

>you sound mentally ill.


>ahhhhhhhhhhh you're a moid!!!! a moid!!!!!


Jesus. Sometimes I wish I was, to avoid getting lumped with crazies like you.

Anonymous 73321

>>73320
Hating men is completely rational since they have been enslaving and raping women for millenia. Writing it off as a sign of the times is idiotic; it is in their blood and always will be. It’s more pathological to trust them. Sorry for your internalized misogyny, but then why are you even here if you’re just going to whitemaid men?

Anonymous 73322

>>73321
I'm not defending men, I'm just saying you sounded like a crazy person.

Anonymous 73324

>>73322
…For disliking men. Which goes back to my point. Why is it that when women rightly express a natural hatred of men that they are viewed as crazy? Spend 10 minutes on malechan and see what they think should happen to you for daring to exist as a woman. They're the crazy ones. If you're not a man, you sure are a cringy handmaiden.

Anonymous 73327

>>73324
Your opinion is alright. The way you wrote made you sound crazy. Here's a reminder:

>I have never had a boyfriend and it makes me sad. I hate men. I’m so lonely. I wish I were a lesbian. That disgusts me. I’m going to be alone forever. Now I understand single women who adopt their way into single motherhood. I will be like Mary but instead of the evil male God I will have Venus in my heart. There are women who have boyfriends and vivaciousness and are happy. Why couldn’t that be me? Why why why


Here we have:
>short disjointed sentences, rapidly segwaying from point to point.
>bizarre allusions to religion (evil male God?)
>why why why why

Anyway I cannot be bothered to keep explaining why you sounded like a crazy person- and you did- so why don't you get back to whining that you don't have a boyfriend and aren't happy.

Anonymous 73332

>>73327
Nice essay pseudoanalyst. You're the one posting on a thread about not having boyfriends on a female website to complain that… women are talking about not having boyfriends? God you're insufferable. Why don't you just fuck off back to reddit since it's too crazy here with staccato and mentions of god.

Anonymous 73333

>>73332
lmao

Yeah, I do have a boyfriend, you crazy bitch.

>back to reddit

lmao

Anonymous 73341

Julianne-Moore-in-…

>>73236
I was just like you now I'm dating the guy I didn't feel good enough for and I'm living in constant pain because I feel I don't deserve him at all. Improve yourself or remain single, reality is going to crush me hard when he breaks up with me. I'm regretting this post so much but I think it's honest.

Anonymous 73353

>>73341
Why not improve yourself while in the relationship anon?

Also don't give in to the insecurity, nothing kills attraction faster. Do more cool things, enjoy what you have with him, you're gonna make it.

Anonymous 73356

>>73355
>anyone can physically harm you
Statistically it's usually the male partners, friends and family members

Anonymous 73357

Serious answer, anyone can physically harm you, except for maybe infants, the very elderly and the disabled. If you cohabited with other women of any strength, or even just men of weaker strength, they would be plenty capable of harming you if they felt like it, and you wouldn't necessarily be able to defend yourself from it much better. Taking into consideration that all people can harm you, I'd think these women like a guy who is strong and makes them feel safe from the world, and who they know is capable of defending them from anything that could threaten them easily, but who they trust to never turn it around and abuse them, and only care for and protect them. The reality is of course you shouldn't ever trust moids but I get the fantasy

Anonymous 73359

>>73356
I know and don't disagree, was just talking about capability since that was what the original post was about I think, the "my man can throw me" shit

Anonymous 73360

>>73353
Thanks for your words, anon, I really appreciate. I'm trying to improve but I can't get on his level no matter how hard I work.
>don't give in to the insecurity, nothing kills attraction faster.
That's true, but it's hard to ignore those feelings.

Anonymous 73382

It feels good and fun at first but around 6 months in you start getting clingy and obsessive if you decide they are good enough to be husband material.
Then you wonder why you turned into such a bitch when you obsess over every tiny thing he ever did in the past.

Anonymous 73436

>>73316
>Why are they okay with cohabiting with someone who can overwhelm them physically?
Anon no two people are of the same strength or skill in combat, anyone living with anyone else is 'cohabiting with someone who/they can overwhelm them physically'.
Plus you're looking at this the wrong way, those people don't think about the damage the partner could potentially do to them, their partner's strength is comforting because its used to protect them.

Anonymous 73443

>>73317
God is neither evil nor male, and Venus is a pagan goddess that was worshipped by ancient Romans, women were treated far worse in the Roman Empire than they were in the Christian kingdoms of Europr, and slavery in ancient Rome was widespread. Also, it was thanks to Christianity that the institution of slavery was eliminated from Europe.

Anonymous 73444

>>73443
*Europe

Anonymous 73446

>>73445
I was referring specifically to the Catholic Church, the Bible has been used by both abolitionists and pro-slavers to support their positions.

Anonymous 73453

>>73443
NO. FUCK OFF. YOU ARE A MOID. FUCK OFF. VENUS IS MY PATRON GOD AND I KNOW CHRISTIANS, THEY ARE FUCKING EVIL.

Anonymous 73462

>>73436
Not her, but I really dislike it when people analogize romantic relationships with parental ones. Parental relationships are special, and it seems like a corruption to compare them with romantic relationships. And I dislike it when two people in a relationship have very different things that they want from each other. In my opinion, love should be something that people should go into without any expectations. You can get a strong male role model to replace your failure of a father if you want but don't call it love.

Anonymous 73483

>>73453
The most evil of the Venus-worshipping pagan Romans were far more evil than the most evil of the Christians. It's a shame that your view of all Christians has been influenced by the worst of us, we're not all like that.

Anonymous 73484

>>73483
I'm pretty sure nazis have the same view on things. "Real national socialism hasn't been tried yet" and so on. We always have to assume the worst when it comes to ideology and religion.

Anonymous 73492

>>73443
All of these empires were shitty to women and I was talking about a symbol of feminine power, not moids who have been dead for 500 years.

Anonymous 73494

>>73492
Wu Zetian. China. Long ass ago. Wasnt a super responsible leader but had two twin young moids as her concubines, she was building up her harem at like 50. She got into power by machiavellian genius using her influence to raise among the social ranks and she just did overall good plays. She started as a concubine of some moid and she ended with his Empire in the end lol.

Anonymous 73511

1610239820321.JPG

>>73484
That analogy doesn't apply, since "real" Christianity has already been tried, the ideal that all true Christians strive to be like is the examplar of love, kindness and forgiveness. The bad Christians you encountered do not change the ideal.

Anonymous 73513

>>73492
>I was talking about a symbol of feminine power
Who were the first to consider her a symbol of feminine power? All of the pagan deities were entirely the creations of their followers, and they derived their powers from the myths and beliefs of their followers, they cannot be separated from their followers and examined as if they were independent entities. God exists independent of his followers, the pagan deities are intrinsically tied to their followers. The only reason Venus is of any relevance today is because of the temples and dedications that her pagan followers offered her, and I'm right in assuming that a lot of those same followers would be abhorrent to you. Consider the Roman general Julius Caesar, who considered Venus as his ancestor. Caesar continually dedicated his military victories to Venus, and his campaigns have been one of the cruelest in the ancient world, more than 1 million Gauls, girls, boys, women, and men, died as a result of his Gallic wars, and 1 million more were enslaved.

Anonymous 73515

>>73445
The only reason slavery is not ubiquitous today is Christianity and the Catholic church, who purged Europe of it in the middleages starting with prominent clergymen freeing their slaves and hiring them as servants, and the British Empire for imposing its anti-slavery ideals on the entire world through colonialism.

Anonymous 73526

>>73516
>Seriously though, your Yahweh isn't some transcendental, universal, mathematical, scientific, "independent", "separate from his followers" god that somehow rises above the rest.
>Like all gods, he has his own holy books riddled with inconsistencies, his own science-contradicting mythos, his own personality, his own jealousy and tyrannical tendencies, his own dated morality
I disagree, please show me what makes you think the above things are true.
>And Christians were far from the first to conceive a single perfect absolute god - see Zoroastrianism and Hinduism.
God communicated with Humanity a lot earlier than the year 0AD, Zorastrianism and Hinduism, even though they are as a whole wrong, could possibly have borrowed some of their teachings the from those earlier when God communicated with Humanity.
>Holy wars waged by Christians: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion (yes I know there were other causes, but Christianity was still a major factor)
>Every religion has its followers that commit atrocities. While they may justify their atrocities in religious terms, Christians (and other Abrahamists) are unique in that their religion is actually what LEADS them to commit atrocities.
Christianity did not cause those wars, even though some of them were sanctioned by Christian religious figures as defenesive wars, such as the crusades defending Christianity from Islamic conquests. And the atrocitied committed by soldiers fighting in Christian armies were in no way permitted by any Christian religious figures. It is true that some of those wars were committed in the name of Christianity by evil people, but Christianity was used an excuse, it wasn't a direct cause. Some of the wars following the Protestant reformation are examples of such wars. Christian Churches did not have perfect command of their followers, and often times their power was rebuked by secular powers, examples of this are all of the times Rome was conquered by Christian Kings attacking the Pope.
>Holy wars waged by Pagans: none
Pagans also justified their wars using their pagan religions. And pagand were often far crueler to the people they conquered than Christians were. Examples of this are all of the times that the men in ancient cities were murdered and the women and children were enslaved by other pagans, such as the Athenian conquest of Melos. Very few pagan religions regarded mercy as a virtue, while mercy is one of the central virtues of Christianity.
>1807 CE: Britain outlaws the slave trade
Nta, slavery in Europe was long outlawed by then (except for Europeans lands held by the Ottomans), Britains actions against slavery were centered on slavery in the Americas, Africa, and Asia.



[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]