>you will never have visible abdominal muscles
Good, they dont look good on women
I don't mind, at my age I think soft mom bod is the best.
How old are you?>>4059
I like the idea but I hate how you need implants then to keep your tits.
I like slight visible abdominal muscles
or moderate kind
Not this exaggerated shit
Sure I will, they are getting more and more visible. Won't lose all the body fat tho.
Do you have visible abdominal muscles OP?
>>4061>soft mom bod even tho I'm not a mom>not fat anymore but still skinnyfat>friend said I'm "mushy" when hugged as if that as a compliment
Teach me how to think like you
This, a flat tummy is enough for me
Oh yes I always wanted a body that’s only attractive to repressed homos.
I like thicc muscular girls
I think a little higher body fat percentage partnered with muscle is the best look
I would not really want OPs pic, though she does look great
I want to look like prime Cory Everson but I don’t have that kind of endurance and it would take several years to get that body.
It's impossible to pack that muscle mass without taking massive doses of steroids
Incorrect. Cory Everson was a natural who trained for 20 years to get that body. Don't disrespect the greats like that when you don't know anything about lifting.
Please post progress pics and keep us updated! What shape are you in now? Are you mentally Stacy (please post progress about that too)?
imagine being this ignorant
Synthetic compound designed to bring the dawn of a new age. It mimics the mass-building effects of testosterone at excessively efficient levels without most of the repercussions regular test would have. Doesn't work well on men due to existing testosterone keeping it out of the system.
So a testosterone for women?
Yep. Wasn't meant to be, but that's what it became. What do you think?
Thats just because strict keto is boring. If you can do strict keto diet then you can have visible abs.
she has breast implants and possibly lipo on her stomach
Slightly off topic…but I am an apple shape with a huge ribcage. Right now I'm at the skinniest in my entire life, 21 bmi, but still have a massive 34 inch waist.
I have skinny legs that I really don't want to get smaller, hardly any boobs, and no hips. Am I better off just losing more weight even if it might make my huge upper half look bigger? Is having a smaller waist more important?
You could do lots of legs and butt workout so they become more shapely and balance out your upper body
I have been for a while already, I kind of regret it though because I should have just been cutting (I don't want to lose muscle mass).
admittedly read up on it and apparently it's a thing that women say they were hit on more when they were underweight (16 bmi type) than normal (20 bmi) which is a huge doom pill.
If the problem lies in your bone structure, losing weight won't really help, as you lose weight evenly on your entire body, I think. You can try working out to accentuate other parts of your body, like legs, and wearing the right clothes. But if you want to make your actual waist smaller, you either need to wear corsets or have some surgeries (don't know much about that part though)
lose more weight. bmi 21 isn't that skinny actually
Why are you telling someone with a normal weight to lose weight?
because if they want a snatched waist they need to lose more weight
If she has a BMI of 21 and a 34 inch waist, she will not have a "snatched" waist through weight loss anyway. It's misleading and unhealthy to tell her all she needs to do is shut her mouth.
Maybe what she needs is realistic goals and to understand that many of the instagram and tiktok influencers she likely follows don't have "snatched waists" either without the help of filters and shapewear.
calm it with the scare quotes anon
the anon did ask if she should lose weight and she has 3 bmi points to go before she hits underweight. it's not dangerous to lose a little more weight. if her waist is the part where she is holding weight then it is likely to get smaller if she loses more weight
and i didn't tell her to shut her mouth, wtf
I forgot there are still people who think you can just set your BMI to whatever you want as if we were Sim characters heh.
Losing at a rate of about 0.5kg a week would require a daily caloric deficit of about 500kcal. Depending on her height, this could mean eating less than 1000kcal per day. Seeing that she already lost weight to get to where she is, it would probably mean going lower. All for the sake of a "snatched waist" that she will never get. Do you think that's good advice?
how do you know she won't a get a waist?
>Losing at a rate of about 0.5kg a week would require a daily caloric deficit of about 500kcal. Depending on her height, this could mean eating less than 1000kcal per day.
then lose weight more slowly or just exercise more, duh
are you american or something that you think a bmi below 21 is skeletal?
>>15471>I forgot there are still people who think you can just set your BMI to whatever you want as if we were Sim characters heh.
You literally can though. Even if your body deals with calories more conservatively than the middle of the bell curve, you still have to deal with thermodynamics. If you cut calories below a deficit, your body's weight will go down and will continue going down until you stop eating at deficit. I keep myself between 18% and 18.7% because I want to live as long as possible and mice between those weights live longer than their normal weight peers.
eh, original anon here. being completely honest I'm 90% sure my waist and midsection will still look very bad. I think genes did me really dirty. I have a friend irl that's half a foot shorter than me and is the same weight, but visibly looks much more slender and snatched than me in spite of her fat not all going to her lady bits. She wears a size small shirt, while I wear large (most of them are still snug on me).
Also, she has never lifted weights and I have, so I have more muscle weight than her.
I think I will still try, but I think I will never have a decent body.
you lift weight for bodybuilding or just to get stronger?
Maybe try wearing corsets then.
If you have a lot of muscle but it isn’t visible, then you just need to lose some fat.
What is your band size for your bra? Usually that’s a good indicator of what your waist circumference can at maximum reach at your lowest weight. Honestly for an apple shape any sort of weight on you will not look good. You should definitely aim for the lower end around bmi of 16-18. Either that or consider lipo-ing your midsection if you want to stay at a higher weight. Women with your waist circumference are at a much higher risk of dying from heart disease though, so maybe consider decreasing a lot more bodyfat.
32 inches at the tightest. >>15476
stronger mostly; I focus on my lower body.