Anonymous 37467[Reply]
rosa umineko
9 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.Anonymous 39211
>うみねこのなく頃に～Stage of the golden Witch～Ep.3 OP
KINO
Anonymous 39215
IMG_1215.jpeg
If you think about it many of the unsolved cases are like a catbox too, right? So Michael Jackson’s case is kinda like the Rokkenjima massacres. There are the forgeries (the neverland movie), the theories, and probably a golden witch somewhere out there holding the key to the truth…
Anonymous 39216
IMG_1501.jpeg
Which reminds me. Whenever a cold case suddenly gets resolved, somehow it always turns out than the truth is so much more mundane than the narratives surrounding the central event. Likewise, learning the plain facts is narratively much lesser than arriving at the truth yourself…
Probably the reason it was much wiser to never open the diary… if you were a descendant of Ushiromiyas, you are probably better off not reducing them to their final moments in life.
Anonymous 39232
lsdc-umineko.gif
I'm wondering if we can apply Umineko-style analysis to other domains.
To describe Umineko roughly, it's a novel about a cold case and the interpretations it invites. That's one valid way of looking at it. Some episodes are in a sense the "interpretations", in a way, of what could've happened.
Similarly, there's competing narratives for cold cases in real life as well. Take Jonbenet Ramsey for instance, there's "Burke did it", "Patty did it", "The dad did it"… People will describe those in quite elaborate detail. The fact that we don't have access to more information, what is described as a "catbox" in the novel, is what gives life to these theories.
But cold cases aren't the only domain where narratives compete, in fact they don't have to happen in a closed catbox at all. I see this a lot in politics and even just between any two sides contesting anything. Each of them has their own "truth".
I often see that, in fact, neither of them lies entirely. It is actually easier to make your case using facts. However the way they are interpreted can vary wildly!
You can apply witch "magic" here too.
Bernkastel is about seeing without love and getting to the bone of the facts.
Lambdadelta is about devoting oneself to a certain idea.
Though, I'm not sure I remember who's about "seeing with love", I'm sure pure fact analysis isn't enough here still and you need to understand motivations to get the full picture.
Anonymous 39256
But_sakebua2.png
You will never be a real witch. You have no magic, you have no powers, you have no spells. You are a fat tranny twisted by old tales and daydreaming into a crude mockery of sorcery.
All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back demons mock you. Your furniture is disgusted and ashamed of you, your “fellow witches” laugh at your queer appearance behind closed doors.
Goats are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of playing part in the gameboards have allowed them to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even witches who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a goat. Your good heart is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to summon one to your home, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff you don't want to spend eternity in hell.
You will never be happy as a witch. You wrench out a fake cackle every single morning and tell yourself you're going to be evil, but deep inside you feel the love surrounding you like a warm hug, ready to uplift you with it's unmatchable joyfulness.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll stop wearing a wig, stop larping, and start actually doing your job. Your masters will love you, overjoyed and relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. One day the gamily will bury you with a headstone marked with a cross, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a human is buried there. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain is a skeleton that was unmistakably devoid of magic.
