/media/ - Media

I had a bunch growing up. They were just vessels for my sick soap opera fantasies so I never thought about what they looked like much.

Barbies were no different than any other toy growing up such as Legos or playing outside: They were tools for my imagination to play with. I loved Barbies growing up. I noticed how sexualized and cheap they look now. My mom's Barbies from the 60s and my Barbies from the 90s are way better and more normal looking. The modern ones just look like Bratz rip-offs. And I've always detested Bratz for their sexualized and cheap quality and encouraging girls to have bad attitudes about everything. What are those resting bitch face Barbies are called?

idk maybe? as other have nonas said, I liked them a lot for being vessels to create stories and stuff, but there is a chance that there was some kind of subconscious association.

I've never cared about barbies, but I don't know if it's cause I was contrarian or I wasn't quite socialized. I preferred animal toys.

>Are they harmful to kids?

Yes and the new woke bullshit they're trying to do is so fake it's revolting. Don't get me wrong I loved them as a kid but they definitely did make me feel I needed to be a certain set of things to be womanly and beautiful.

They have LLM chatbot dolls that send recordings of your child to their marketing bots. I'm sure your local government can pay to have patriotic ideas added to the conversation at regular intervals.

What a time to be alive.

I used to not like them because of the whole unrealistic bodies for young girls thing as well the weird oversexualization Barbie went through. After seeing the 2023 Barbie movie I think the brand realized the issues and is trying to fix them so I at least respect the brand more now (other than the fact that Mattel has shown to be batshit). I never really owned Barbie's growing up, I was more of a plushie/pillowpet/squishmallows owner as a kid

>>37675
Are you serious? The brand doesn't want to "fix their mistakes" they only want to sell more dolls, and they realized that they needed to clean their image to do so.

>>37676
That poster is obviously pretty young to have had a squishmallow as a kid. We all have to learn some time.

>>37677
As the young nona I just realized that squishmallows and pillowpets are different. I only owned pillowpets as a child. Also I'm not that young but I appreciate the compliment

>>37676
This
>>37675
Companies don't really care about their consumers, they just realized that parents don't want to buy their daughters toys that can have a negative impact on their emotional well-being

>>37676
Probably but I still liked the movie tbh and I don't actually hate Barbies. Mattel does suck though

I had a few Barbies when I was a kid, and I loved them.
I also never compared myself to my dolls. Somehow, I always knew they were "examples" of American women and that I simply knew I would never be like them, which didn't bother me. I must have had an ideal of beauty ingrained in my mind because of them, but I never wanted to model myself on them; I always knew they were just toys.

>>37669
I also had this very clear and objective in my mind: my Barbies were characters in my stories.

>>37670
I noticed that Barbies are getting uglier and of lower quality with each passing year, I think I was lucky because I got a good phase when I was a child, and I had very pretty Barbies, but now there are much prettier ones than them.

>>37668
How are they supposed to be harmful to kids? It's only harmful if as an adult or teenager you compare yourself to a toy. Why would you want to do that?

>>37668
Bratz are worse, girls shouldn't be called that