Radfem thread #2 Anonymous 181244
Old thread reached post limit. This thread is discussion of radical feminism, please generalized tranny hate and memes in the TERF meme thread.
How do you think we can counteract plastic surgery as a culture. Although I blame individuals for getting surgery because they gave in, I more strongly blame society for convincing them that they needed to undergo a dangerous surgery to not hate themselves.
It's a difficult situation because there's a misogynistic component on both ends of the spectrum, at least when moids do it.
With the pro plastic side It's pretty obvious but on the anti side there's scrotes who feel "lied" to by women who even choose to get minor things done like slight rynoplasties. (Friend of mind experienced this exact thing)
The only thing that really comes to mind is to get people to condemn commodity and commodification on a wider level.
Make people more anti-consumerist. That would certainly at least do a number on "bimbo" culture for lack of a better term
One thing I learned after going vegan was that people will very easily lie to themselves if it allows them to engage in debaucherous, immoral, or self-undermining practices. Even if they know it's wrong, they'll just lie to others and on a superficial level to themselves. This is why pick-mes just outright ignore the rational points made by radfems. Yes, everyone's heard patriarchy's 'choice-feminism' spiel, but they've also heard radfems rightly point out that if your 'choice' is to, say, wear makeup because it makes you feel good, then you should question why you feel less good without it. Libfems have all heard this - they just choose to ignore it because the pull of male validation is too strong. So, as >>181351 said, the only solution is to ridicule pick-mes, because pick-mes don't listen to reason or act in their own self interest, they respond only to shaming, which is why they're so committed to debasing themselves to begin with. >>181319
I always found it funny how so many people were critical of plastic surgery but not makeup - they're both embarrassingly pitiful.
Makeup is temporary and a fashionability like clothing or hair styling.
Plastic surgery is permanent. There also are styles of makeup that are more socially condemned than others similarly to plastic surgery.
women wear makeup their whole lives - that shit is a permanently ingrained habit. also the reason this stuff is bad isn't because it lasts a while on your face, it's bad because it involves self objectification, and that's true of both plastic surgery and makeup.
that's because they are holier than thou - they literally kill less animals and fuck the planet up less than you
>>181422>they literally kill less animals and fuck the planet up less than you
The meat that every vegan would have eaten if they were not one still gets produced, packaged, etc. The only difference is instead of getting bought it just gets thrown out. We throw out enough food to feed 2 entire Californias every year.
Supply is not strictly based off of demand it's about growth in scale as well so vegans effectively change nothing by just becoming vegans their own self. And all forms of large scale farming are bad for the environment anyway Thanks to things a lot of farmers do like liquefy manure to fertilize their fields.
It's no different than driving an EV in a 99% coal based power grid.
>>181430>The meat that every vegan would have eaten if they were not one still gets produced, packaged, etc. The only difference is instead of getting bought it just gets thrown out.
Are you retarded? mfw you've never heard of supply and demand. Yes, corporations just make excess product to throw it out because ???
>Supply is not strictly based off of demand it's about growth in scale as well so vegans effectively change nothing by just becoming vegans their own self.
This would only be true if supply had nothing to do with demand, but it does, because that's just basic economics. I mean, I can't tell if you don't see how insanely stupid this argument is because of copium induced delirium so you can keep eating nuggies or what.
I'm critical of both, but I hold less disgust for make up. Taking the step of going under anesthesia and having an elective surgery seems so much more horrifying even though make up is so much more prominent in our culture.
>The meat that every vegan would have eaten if they were not one still gets produced, packaged, etc.
The basic laws of supply and demand refute this, let alone my experience in animal agriculture. When demand drops, there may be a two to four year lag because of how raising meat animals works, but we definitely reduce the number of animals raised if demand remains low. Otherwise prices drop and it becomes less profitable as you're raising more animals for less money. Crops are different, because the government pays you almost no matter what, but meat follows demand.
I looked it up just to be completely sure and the only thing I was wrong about is that consumers are responsible for most of the meat waste in America.
However grocery stores and restaurants still throw away 4% of their inventory nationwide every year.
With a population of less than 1% vegan, that is a pretty damning confirmation that they do in fact throw out the meat vegans would have eaten.
Your entire post was premised on the idea that reducing demand for meat/dairy wouldn't impact the supply of meat/dairy. You were wrong about that, and your post here is a non sequitur. Your newer post would be relevant only if meat waste increased
as a result of lower demand to such an extent that the supply of meat was unaffected. This, also, is incorrect. I thought b12 from meat and dairy was supposed to make you not retarded?
shoo shoo shoo you…
>Your entire post was premised on the idea that reducing demand for meat/dairy wouldn't impact the supply of meat/dairy.
That was not the premise of my original post. The premise of my original post is that current vegans leave no impact.
I am not so delusional to believe that if we got like 50% of the population to stop eating meat in this country it would lead to no decline in the industry but there are a lot of other factors, and also, vegans are sure as shit, never going to be effective enough at getting people to stop.
>Your newer post would be relevant only if meat waste increased as a result of lower demand to such an extent that the supply of meat was unaffected.
You mean the point I am not trying to prove that you just burdened me with out of nowhere? Sure.
>I thought b12 from meat and dairy was supposed to make you not retarded?
I had no such illusions about vegan diets promoting intelligence, so nothing about your post surprises me.
>all these people defending makeup
makeup isn't good for you. it's bad for your skin, its got this nasty chemically smell I don't know how people stand it, it doesn't feel good on your face it's like this waxy/pastey awfulness, its bad in the summer or if you go to the gym when you sweat, its bad in humid environments, it's one more thing added on to make your morning longer, and last - but certainly not least - it's expensive
by all means you do you, but I can't stand it. yes I'm aware there are "better" versions of some makeup out there that answer some of my concerns, but no thank you. chuck that stuff you'll be happier for it.
>People will lie to themselves to engage in immoral practices.>Uh no, I belive supply & demand doesn't aply to meat :^)
Pretty funny how you just proved the point by trying to argue agaisn't it with your delusional logic.
Why would you want to? Plastic surgery and body augmentations are the way of the future! Can you imagine a world where everyone is hot and for once we can just rely on our personalities to get a date?
This assumes that one, that anyone is able to become hot through plastic surgery. Yet it's widely known and mocked when people get too much plastic surgery because they look uncanny. Two, being hot is an ever changing objective. What men consider hot today is not what they considered hot thirty years ago. So you would continuously keep having to get surgery to keep up with the trends. Three, it is unlikely that the price of plastic surgery would decrease enough that everyone is able to afford the multiple surgeries. Even cars, which are an absolute necessity for working people and which our entire culture are built around, are not affordable to everyone. So there will never be a time when every single person can afford plastic surgery. And four, when everyone is beautiful, no one will be. Beauty must be different from the average in order to be considered special.>pic related: pictures of people with plastic surgery
Body augmentations are only good in a world without capitalism. Already, some people who have fake eyes have had them turned off because the company that made their software went bankrupt and there are no more updates. So they're just consigned to being blind again.
What's going on.jp…
They can. The reason that a lot of other women end up looking completely fucked up from PS is because they either get addicted to it or end up with botched surgery. Just google "korean before and after plastic surgery"
It's sort of like with other women make up. Pretty much every single girl wears it for a reason. It's because it makes us look better and more attractive in the eyes of guys (and other women.)
And I'm not talking your "Natural skin" I mean with zero make up. (I can spot it from a mile away!) >Hot is subjective
Hot varies in degrees and from person to person, but there is a pretty universal standard which is to just not be ugly. >>182254
A world without capitalism and body augmentations do not mix.
>I'm a feminist which is why I call women cunts
You have the reading comprehension of a lesser simian.
>>182266>A world without capitalism and body augmentations do not mix.
A prosthetic leg is a body augmentation, so they would still exist in a just world.
That's most people online at this point.
Thanks for the thread op, whoever makes the next one could you copy paste the basics in the first one I think it'd be good to have for women who just stumbled across the thread and are being introduced to radical feminism.
Definitely noted. I figured if someone on was crystal cafe, they knew what rad feminism is, especially if they're posting in the radfem thread, but I see now I was mistaken. That's okay though, everyone is ignorant of something until they are taught.
if i hear one more man say cunt and then insist it isn't a slur i'm gonna shit myself
Slurs are a particular kind of obscenity, using swear words to describe genitals is not the same as using sluts.
You should absolutely never tolerate being called a "cunt" by a moid but tbh this.
"Ma'am, that's my emotional support slur!"
just realized i accidentally said "sluts" lol
The one word answer chad meme doesn't really work when it's a completely abstract position, you're literally just telling us you think your opinion is cool. It works with things that have some skin in the game like "Are you really just going to go out every weekend and run over homeless people with a Ford F150 even though they didn't do anything to you personally???" "Yes."
If a moid calls me a bitch or a cunt what is the difference?
Is there some sliding scale of respect? Or is it a binary.
>>181422>they literally kill less animals
nothing morally righteous about that>and fuck the planet up less than you
it's not that simple
not everyone finds absurdist humour funny, or notices it even necessarily
what some see is you(silly) = wrong, me(based) right
Does anyone have statistics about the effectiveness of the Nordic Model vs. completely legalised prostitution? Does it actually help?
If women have already explained in precise language why cunt is a slur and the man either refuses to look it up or ignores them, it is not my job to hold their hand and re-explain it countless times until he figures it out. I would just as succinctly dismiss the same man who threw a fit about not being allowed to use the term wetback or moon cricket.
Although I personally recognize some words as worse than others based on how offended I would be if someone called me them, I would more label slurs as binary, either they are or they aren't.
I read an interesting essay on tracking the word for girl across different languages. In the six or seven languages noted, they had all had to change the polite word for girl to another term recently (within living memory), because the word for girl would be used as slang first for an adult woman, then as slang for a prostitute or female genitalia. The essay also noted that the author had found no examples of this happening to the word boy.
Does anyone have ideas on how to connect with radfems IRL?
Aask on Ovrit? They seem to mean serious biz.
Afaik they actually found decriminalisation and the Nordic model actually increased human trafficking to those countries
I just don't think there is any good reason not to ban both sides of prostitution if you're going to ban it at all. Places like Sweden can be trusted not to needlessly harass prostitutes when enforcing these laws, but it's a tool they need to have handy. Sometimes arresting someone is a way to protect them, get them off the street and force them to receive help instead of hoping they just randomly come to their senses.
Decriminalization and Nordic model are two opposite things though, do you mean to say that they both increase trafficking and harm?
TERF thread deleted again, what the fuck is going on?
I dunno, but I worry something's going on with the jannies.
Most likely troon sabotage. I made a new one >>183288
Yeah, it's like the janitors are using the clean up as an excuse to get rid of the terf meme thread. But the terf thread is literally the most popular thread on this entire site, we're going to immediately notice when it goes missing.
The one word answer Chad meme is never funny at all.
If you've already explained to somehow how mean they are and they're still doing it, they're the one acting like the chad meme, not you. You're getting boned.
I try to ignore it because it really pisses me off, removes the soul of this stuff. I got in this long argument with this one zoomer online when they told me that I was "out of the loop" (or some such cringe) and didn't know what 'based' meant because I was explaining how it is a fundamentally neutral term that could be defined as "self-assured; acts with disregard to the concerns of others" (and I gave examples) and they thought that they were so cool for knowing the supposed real truth that it just means "agree"
I guess what I'm really pissed about is people who have 30 seconds worth of knowledge thinking they know everything and refusing to ever concede to someone who obviously knows way more about a topic, but that's a little much to take on right now.
How is them flying into a rage and typing paragraph after paragraph about how cunt is not a slur them being Chad? It didn't happen in this conversation in this thread, but I watched it happen on Tumblr and men just throw screaming fits over it. Men want to use slurs, and they will throw tantrums when you tell them that slurs are inappropriate.
There's at least a case to be made, I just made it. Also, their walls of text are in support of a controversial opinion, you're just telling them not to be rude and then venting about it here when they continue. There is no chad element whatsoever.
Also it needs to be acknowledged that they actually have a point, "cunt" legitimately has a different use in the UK and Australia. The literal meaning is the same but the context is different, and all of these things rely on context. I notice you're not raging about how people use "pussy" as an insult, even though it refers to the exact same thing. That's because American culture doesn't see it as a big deal so you don't either, and it's the same for Brits and "cunt". Also you're obvious not up in arms about penis-based obscenities.
>>183580>I notice you're not raging about how people use "pussy" as an insult, even though it refers to the exact same thing.
It's because you know nothing about me. Pussy should not be used as an insult either. Even though it's from the word pusillanimous and not descended from the word for cat.
>>183580>Also you're obvious not up in arms about penis-based obscenities.
Men can figure their own shit out. I fight for women's liberation, not men's feelings.
>>183580>"cunt" legitimately has a different use in the UK and Australia
Yeah, in parts of the UK/Ireland/Australia/NZ "cunt" is thrown around pretty indiscriminately. I mean, it's basically used as a substitute word for "person".
>You're a good cunt.
Read: You're a good person
>She's a mad cunt.
Read: She's silly.
>He's a pure cunt.
Read: He's contemptible.
I do think people should be careful how they word things online, but it is quite funny to see yanks being really offended by it. "Fanny" was probably the more obscene word when I was growing up, maybe slightly worse than calling someone a "dick".
>>183652>Fanny" was probably the more obscene word than dick
Doesn't that prove the slur point though? That the worst taboo words used to denigrate people are always related to women and female genitalia. That our very existence is considered impure and lesser and so is used as an insult?
Even if using that slur is part of someone's culture, it's still a sexist culture and should be fought against. Not letting women vote was part of most of the world's culture, does that mean you'll argue for that too?>>183708
Shut up Blaine. You will never be a woman and your mother is more woman than you could ever hope to be, even in your wildest dreams.
It's pretty clear that you see it as much less of a big deal, because you get that the context is different. In America "pussy" is just sexist in terms of what it actually means and people are just using it interchangeably with "coward", whereas "cunt" can be used intentionally to be sexist. In the UK, neither is largely meant to be sexist. >>183712
It's just kind of silly to demand that four other countries with different dialects of your language change this substantial part of how they communicate just because it is upsetting in a purely American context. I completely get telling them not to when they're visiting here or something, but that doesn't seem to be the point.
I don't mean this literal 1:1 comparison at all but it can illustrate what I'm talking about: In Spanish when someone types "negro", they mean the color black. In American english, it is an insulting term for people of African descent. We would of course not tolerate a Spanish-speaking person random "switching languages" mid sentence or some shit just as an excuse to drop it as a totally-not-slur, but in their home country it legitimately has a different use and attempts by outsiders to prevent its use (indeed, there have been some) don't work at all, and are actually quite intolerant.
Also, I'm not trying to be super pedantic here but this should be talked about: the basic use of "slur" is a literal slurring of words. "Nigger" is a slur because it is a sloppy pronunciation of "negro" (at a time when negro was not considered to be inherently offensive), and it became the disrespectful way to say negro. It's debatable whether referring to something by a different word that is pronounced correctly (i.e., cunt instead of woman). A pure slur for women would be like "wumbens" or some shit.
Basically, you might have a better time if you just talk about whether a word is offensive, than specifically trying to show that a word is a slur.
Just because a lot of people do it doesn't mean it's okay. Jesus what are you all even doing in the radfem thread if you want to defend the vile shit men call women. Bitch is okay because it's used by gay men in a friendly way right?
Literally, yes. Words don't have inherent meanings, it is all about context.
>>at a time when negro was not considered to be inherently offensive
It's still not. It is literally the Spanish word for "black". There's even a cake called Negra and a Mexican sweet called "Negrito". Neither of which is meant to be racist. This is just the U.S. using it's own historical context of one word against to apply it to all of the rest of the world, because they think they are the center of the world. >>183746
This. Me and my friends called eachother niggerfaggots as an inside joke, back in high school. One of those people was even a black guy. And none of us were straight.
what the fuck are you talking about nona?? words absolutely do have inherent meanings T-T
like, "book" only ever means book. it doesnt mean anything else. names are different, like "bitch" can be a dog or a woman, that stuff depends on context. but words as a whole do have natural meaning
>>183741>the basic use of "slur" is a literal slurring of words.
Not to take the thread too off topic, but that is not how the word slur is used and you know it. Otherwise the entire Australian dialect is a slur and should be forbidden.>>183746
Literal coombrained mindrot.
I literally made a post addressing that right above (and I also made the one you separately agreed with lol). But in America, when you are describing a person in the english language, it is considered offensive. >>183749
Lol even when desperately looking for some example that works to make your point, you failed. "Book" can mean "run" (i.e. "I'm about to book it to the library to grab a book"), as well as many other boring things such as 'a book of matches'. That's before getting into what it means in other languages, or what it might mean 50 years from now in english.
It's always amazing how easily people will ignore any attempts to water down what you say before you say it and instead pretend you're saying something really extreme so they can pretend you're unreasonable>I'm not trying to be super pedantic here >It's debatable>Basically, you might have a better time if you just talk about whether a word is offensive
Yeah I know that "slur" has a broad and narrow definition, but there's still a conversation to be had about where it should end. I think that bodily swear words are completely different from rude names for ethnic groups, and trying to use "slur" in that context undermines its value as a word, when others are available. > Otherwise the entire Australian dialect is a slur and should be forbidden.
and this is just a silly statement from top to bottom
>>183712>>Fanny" was probably the more obscene word than dick>Doesn't that prove the slur point though?
No, a slur is "a derogatory or insulting term applied to particular group of people". "Cunt" is applied equally to both men and women where I live, and it isn't considered a sexist insult. I understand that elsewhere it's used as a slur, but not where I live.
>That the worst taboo words used to denigrate people are always related to women and female genitalia.
This is a different point altogether. Whether or not "cunt" is the most dirty word in the English language doesn't affect whether or not it's a slur.
>Not letting women vote was part of most of the world's culture, does that mean you'll argue for that too?
I don't think I'm arguing for anything, I'm just remarking that it's funny to me, as someone for whom that word has never really held the same weight.>>183753> "Book" can mean "run" (i.e. "I'm about to book it to the library to grab a book"), as well as many other boring things such as 'a book of matches'.
This is a nice example. Another is "gay", which was in frequent usage yet had nothing to do with homosexuality prior to the 20th century. Not only does it have multiple meanings, its meanings have completely changed over time.
I think the important thing is the intent behind someone's words, rather than the particular words themselves. Every man in the world could stop using "cunt" (in the slur sense of the word) tomorrow and they'd just replace it with "twat" or "bitch" or "hole". The word is just a sound coming out of their mouths. The same sentiment would still exist in their heads.
>>183767>Every man in the world could stop using "cunt" (in the slur sense of the word) tomorrow and they'd just replace it with "twat" or "bitch" or "hole". The word is just a sound coming out of their mouths
Exactly, or even just take a completely neutral or even positive term and make it derogatory. It's not even hard to turn words like "woman" into angry terms: "You fucking woman!", "You WOMAN!"
Pretty much all of this comes down to intent and perceived intent, the idea that words have magic power independent of their usage and reception is just a nerdy fantasy.
>>183754>I think that bodily swear words are completely different from rude names for ethnic groups
I think you think this because all our lives, we have been taught to put women second. So you think that slurs that offend ethnic groups are worse than slurs that offend women, because you don't consider the oppression that women face to be as real or as bad as ethnic oppression.
>>183767>Cunt" is applied equally to both men and women where I live, and it isn't considered a sexist insult
While I would agree that cunt had less sexist connotations in parts of the world, it being used for men and women both doesn't mean it's not sexist. For example, in America, people will use nigger a general swear (such as shouting it when they stub their toe or a car part breaks), as well as call stealing white people it. Based on your logic, because it is not just used for black people, does this mean nigger is not racist? Because I do not think that it does. I think it remains a slur with racist origins, even when used on white people.
>>183910>WE CALLED EACHOTHER NIGGERFAGGOT>cringe>DO YOU HAVE ANY PEER REVIEWED STUDIES TO PROVE THAT?!
you can dislike some people who happen to be women without hating women as a whole and while still wanting the destruction of the patriarchy
being a feminist doesnt mean you love all women it means you want to dismantle the patriarchy and patriarchal ideals. pickmes are enforcing the patriarchy, that which feminists despise. so why is it wrong to call a pickme a cunt? just because she's a woman? women can be bad people too
There, there. If you want, I'll call you niggerfaggot too.
>>183976>so why is it wrong to call a pickme a cunt?
Because you are using an insult that deliberately denigrates the female sex. Calling them pickmes or handmaidens describes what they are, but calling them a cunt reinforces that female genitalia is an undesirable or shameful thing to be.
Why is it that you can't step five feet in one fandom without rabid gendies festering there? Like in even the most "innocent" of fandoms like with Sanrio?
You'd be liking someone's posts about "Fluffy Kittens Daily" and then OP would make a post like "repost if you want to dismember terfs and rape them with glass"
Fandom would be at your throat if something you said sounded slightly "ableist against neurodivergents" or makes them "uncomfy because its their comfort media" but then spout the most vile shit imaginable about murdering/beating up women who believe things that don't validate them
I am not that anona.
Why so serious?
Well it is, are you tranny who never had periods?
This is a level of self hatred so deep there's probably no cure. I'm sorry you hate you period so much that you hate being a woman. I hate the pain and mess of my period too, but when I get a sinus infection I don't fantasize about chopping my nose off and go around calling people beaks as an insult.
>>183838>because it is not just used for black people, does this mean nigger is not racist? Because I do not think that it does. I think it remains a slur with racist origins, even when used on white people.
I'd agree with this. But "cunt" doesn't designate any particular type of person where I live. I could overhear someone saying "I hate those cunts" and genuinely have no clue whether or not they were referring to a group of males, a group of females, or a mixed sex group of people. That sentence is functionally equivalent to "I hate those dickheads". But the same probably wouldn't be true if I overheard someone saying "I hate those niggers" or "I hate those pakis".
Once in a lifetime inspiration ✨️
periods aren't created by the vagina you absolute moid
I wish I could save her from prison.
Stop listening to men, they have weak brains.
most important asp…
Lol, what a cope by the male researchers.
Yeah psych studies are crazy.>When men are better at a certain task:
oh yes, neuroanatomical dissimilarities, women are inferior>When women are better at a certain task
this can't be, this is an outlier, we need to do more statistics until we prove that men are superior.
Now that incels are pretty much unavoidable on every mainstream social media platform, is anyone else just in a constant state of disbelief over their complaints? I wish my problems with dating and the opposite gender were as puerile as
>I would have to put in effort if I wanted to get laid
>some men I don't know have tattoos and dress in a way I don't like
>this 10/10 model moid is dating a young attractive woman with large breasts and not me
out of the many stupid things male anime fans said, some scrote going "makima has no personality" takes the cake for me.
just because makima doesn't have a personality you like, it doesn't mean she doesn't have a personality. she's in fact a very complex and interesting character. but unfortunately:
1 scrotes see the world in relation to themselves only and speak and think in absolutes, so they can't distinguish between their own pavlov chimp reactions to something and the nature itself of that something, which exists regardless and outside of their perceptions
2 scrotes judge women based on how they would serve them exclusively. makima clearly isn't subservient, isn't nice beyond pleasantries, wouldn't carry their autism soup sperm babies, isn't a cute blushy generic anime girl that makes them feel non threatened, therefore she has no value and ofc, no personality
this goes for how they view women as a whole, too. qualities such as intelligence and strength won't make his dick hard or make it easier for him to manipulate you, so they don't matter even if they're positive. actually, they're negative if a woman has them
to add to this, what makes scrotes absolutely lose their shit over makima is the fact she uses a moid. but not only she uses him, she dares to manipulate him through sex.
scrotes are so pathetically obsessed with sex and the prospect of fucking some girl, that when a woman reminds them of how weak and exploitable they are because of this literal mental illness, they get frustrated at the woman
, instead of calling out the guy who got used (yet they absolutely love to victim blame women all the time lol) or use it as a cautionary tale to stop being a fucking monkey.
just as it seems like the scrote is starting to take an little, awkward step in the right direction (maybe i shouldn't be so ridiculously horny and obsessed with fucking women all the time, and find hobbies and relationships and views beyond that too?), he promptly redirects the disgust he feels at his own weakness towards women, as per usual, staying in his miserable condition and getting rid of the uncomfortable feeling of perceiving to be even slightly in the wrong
My online circle does not include many incels so it's just the constant "Women are bad and inferior in every way" across every platform that I see. I do hear that entitlement to a girlfriend has gotten worse in the younger generations.
I feel bad for anyone under twenty five who's dating men. The boundaries that society say are acceptable have gotten out of control. Apparently men won't even hide their porn folders or masturbation habits and they won't even ask permission before trying something like choking in the bedroom. That's absolutely crazy to me and my friends. To put that in perspective from someone who is older, one time I was having sex with my boyfriend doggy style and he spit on my back. I was so furious that he would degrade me like that that I immediately turned around and slapped him. He was apologetic for weeks afterwards and never did anything in the bedroom without consent again. Of course he didn't argue or try to explain, he knew that he had treated me as an object instead of a lover.
Especially if you're young, I warn against one night stands. The average man is stronger than the average woman and can easily hurt you. So when you put yourself in such a vulnerable position as sex, you should trust him completely and know that he will always stop if you say stop or your body language is reluctant.
Hold on, isn't she just another one of those animu waifus who look all controlling and domineering but in the end secretly want to be a submissive tradwife?
And try to """manipulate""" men by letting them stick their dick in her? At least that's the impression I get from her wiki page, correct me if I'm wrong.
JK Rowling created a new single-sex shelter for women who are victims/at risk of sexual violence.
She's funding it completely herself, so it doesn't adhere to charity laws (ie it's really for women only).https://beirasplace.org.uk
based. i love Makima and yes insecure men are afraid of confident, dominant women. they know they can't manipulate them.
what the fuck is this? men need to be put down
No. Denji wants to do sexual things with her but ultimately when he's given the chance he decides he would rather be her dog and let her take control of his life.
I don't read the manga but in a recent episode she ordered and then sacrificed a bunch of (male) convicts to use her devil powers thing with 0 hesitation or remorse. That's pretty unusual, anime is like marvel shit where even the baddest of bad guys don't get killed, so it was pretty cool to see her kill bad men without giving a shit.
Has anyone you ever knew gotten married as a child? My grandmothers got married at nineteen and seventeen, and a couple of girls in my class got married right out of high school, but I've not known anyone younger than that.
Testicular torsion. Except the implication is that she's doing a spell to make it happen.
Why are blatant misogynists so fond of calling themselves radfems? Is it worth having a bigger tent or should we tell conservatives to fuck off and fight troons on their own terms?
they aren't on our side and we don't need to pretend they are. feminism is diluted enough without misogynists saying they would happily let a young woman die whose biggest crime is being outspoken.
I am a woman, you dolt, being a woman doesn't automatically turn one into a brainless lefty spook.
What state are you from? Also, most positions held by radfems, which is the thread you are in, are considered leftist. Being pro birth control and abortion, encouraging out of home careers (to prevent financial abuse), being in charge of our own finances, and being against child marriage. However, being anti prostitution and against most sex work is usually a right wing thing which is why most of us are politically homeless.
Being in charge of finances and preventing financial abuse should be the rightoid opinion, right? And I don't think all leftoids proactively support prostitution and "sex work" right? Is that not a fringe opinion of younger leftoids? Or are you saying rightoids claim it more. Because I really hope prostitution doesn't get legalized even though OnlyFans is basically a loophole.
I will clarify that I'm American, so I use left as liberal and right as conservative interchangeably.
A woman being in charge of her own finances is a left position, right prefers the man to either be in charge of all finances, or else the woman do the work of the book keeping but the man have the final say over all expenses.
Sex work has become a very leftist view. You'll see older leftist politicians who are against it, but they're the rarity. Nowadays, out of people I know in real life, all liberals under 45 believe that all forms of sex work should be completely legal.
I am not American. Being pro abortion is not a left wing thing where I'm from, it's just a given. Greta, however, is a hack and I am allowed to say kt.
>go on twitch
>click on a random female streamer's livestream
>she's with an old man
>"this is my dad"
>oh ok, phew
>she starts talking about being in porn
>her dad starts talking about his cock
Any father who is comfortable talking about their penis or porn habits around their children is an incest loving pedo and you can't convince me otherwise. It just feels like grooming your kid to erode the proper boundaries between father and child. Starts off getting you comfortable with sexually charged conversations to eventually lead into sexually charged actions. I bet you he watches his daughter's porn, she probably knows it too and copes by claiming he's "supporting her career".
This is so wrong. So I would view this as a subset of incest, and as we see with the porn categories of incest being insanely popular, and House of Dragons making an entire series about incest, incest is becoming more normalized.
I'm starting to see push back against it. Many men on the HoD subreddit were complaining about how gross the constant incest is, as well as I'm seeing men on Twitter complaining about how incest as so overtaken porn that it's hard to avoid it when searching for videos. But now that there's some push back, how do we capitalize on that and push back further?
We need new obscenity laws than ban depictions of crass sexualization and degrading of women, ban depictions of incest, ban depictions of troons and homosexuals, and ban depictions of moids committing acts of violence
You sound like you live in a hyper sheltered fantasy land. Not that I don't disagree with some of it but that would never happen. Learning how to open a portal to heaven sounds easier than ripping porn and violence from coomers.
How can you exist without revealing how completely neurotic you are everywhere you go
Like how can you go outside without betraying your rage at everything
I'm similar in a way but you have to chose what's worth worrying about or you will go completely mad. What you're describing just sounds futile to me kek :v
>>207320>We need new obscenity laws than ban depictions of crass sexualization
That's a lofty but admirable goal>and degrading of women,
Hell yeah>ban depictions of incest,
Absolutely!>ban depictions of troons
Like, any depictions at all? You can't even write a story about a cross dresser?>and homosexuals,
Honey, this is crystal cafe. Half of us are autistic, and half of those are lesbians. We're not going to ban any media depictions of ourselves.>and ban depictions of moids committing acts of violence
Are you just talking about pornography, or are you saying that depictions will be obscene enough to be forbidden under these laws?
Homosexual men deserve chemical castration
I don't get out much recently, my siblings stopped talking to me for repeatedly calling my cousin's man-in-a-dress boyfriend a man and they were my primary social circle>>207325
Yes it should be illegal to talk about trannies in any circumstance outside of medical (exploring therapy or meds to make them normal). Trannies groom others by just making others aware of their existence and what their delusions entail. It's the only way to keep the next generation safe
I'm gay too but I dont flaunt it in front of kids. Stop grooming
I'm talking about all forms of violence. It drives me nuts that people will hand a 6 year old boy a Mario game that trains you to solve problems with violence and acts like it's not a problem
Has anyone mentioned Laetita Ky? She's an African radfem that was dragged through the mud multiple times for being gendercritical. I love her and her artworks and how she actually stands her ground when accused of "transphobia" unlike many other 'feminist' handmaidens. The things people said about her after they found out she supported JKR and called said women instead of 'menstruators' and etc etc is fucking insane
Her and Chimamanda have said a lot of straight forward things and I feel comfortable redirecting friends to either. I wish Chimamanda would write or speak more about this topic but I also understand why she doesn’t.
>>207328>It drives me nuts that people will hand a 6 year old boy a Mario game that trains you to solve problems with violence and acts like it's not a problem
NTA but this is the same show where people throw shoes and beat the shit out of eachother by the way. I don't think they're ones to be moralfagging about violence in video games.
But children aren't meant to be watching the show
Um, I don't think children are meant to be playing most "violent" video games either. That's why we have age-ratings. Although even those are often bullshit, because they still get exposed to some kind of form of shit like someone hitting someone, yelling, or etc. regardless. In that light, Memri TV is a whole news channel so kids are likely still getting exposed to it regardless. I don't want my fun to be taken away from video games only because a bunch of moral crusaders want to use it to ineffectively protect a sociopathic minority of children (Who would likely go on to try and shoot up a school whether they got exposed to said video games or not, anyway) This is a Karen-tier nothingburger.
The ratings are so fucking trash it's unbelievable. Everything that isn't for babies gets a T rating and doesn't go to M unless it's much more bloody violent or pornified (but I've seen less violent and sexual games be put there vs T) so the moment the kid is 13 (if the parents follow the guidelines) they get exposed to everything. Zelda gets the same rating as more violent games like Uncharted because cartoon violence and shooting violence are treated the same unless there's swearing (sometimes) and a gorefest. Uncharted has shooting with blood, booze, and swearing. It's like how recent Pixar movies and fucking Michael Bay's transformers can both be pg13.
Any mildly "edgy" or "hood" game will end up having multiple big breasted women in bras and things so if your kid likes basketball they're going to see casual groupies. Your 13 year old kid can play Batman Arkham games with Batman explicitly not killing anyone (they're just "knocked out") but with dark themes, Zelda cartoon fantasy on par with Pixar, one of the Call of Duty games with all the shooting, Uncharted, Bayonetta which is essentially soft core porn, mindless zombie games, or Syberia a point and click mystery with mature themes but no real violent visuals. It's a mess. I think they should do away with the age rating and instead just list the mature parts of it, and include female nudity as a thing FFS. 13 year old boys don't need any help rotting their brains with porn.
The problem arises from our modern society, people can not handle the availability of options etc. being able to look at thousands of people online completely fucked our perception of relationships. its not just between women and men its between people in general. people need to do such a minimum today and have soo many options, yet they often dont take any. creating a feeling of unhappiness without a clear problem that needs to be fixed, this creates radical feminism and is what promoted males to be so misbehaved, they had all the choices for such a long time free to take, now they dont, they cant handle it, they dont know what to do, so they use what they have, primal violence is just one example.
whats so upsetting about the scientific reality of climate change to some people, i dont get it
and like assuming it isnt real or whatever whats the problem in greener choices anyways, 'noo i dont want to breathe clean air' like ? what
It's not climate change in itself, it's the fact that it's a ploy to sabotage western countries when we're the only ones who give a fuck about the environment anyway.
This. I’m a huge environmentalist bleeding heart, and even I recognize this.
Fr you guys have no idea of the environmental atrocities that are happening in the clandestine gold mining industry and Coral Reef destruction in my 3rd world country. And it's all being done by the government.
But if that's the reason people are upset, why do those same men deny climate change? They won't say "Climate change is real but too much of the burden is placed on us." instead they say "Because snowballs exist, climate change is completely fake."
Global warming is truly dumbest conspiracy theories ever, even compared to flat earth.
Yes indeed climate has habit to change, deal with it.
And compared to volcanoes humanity output is small.
People who actually know what they're talking about don't deny climate change, that's a strawman used to shut down criticisms of wealth redistribution efforts taken under the guise of rectifying climate change. The actual argument, among those who work in the field, isn't if climate change is real or not, it's if 50% or more of it is caused by human activity. Politicians have dumbed things down for the masses and cannot concede even the smallest bit, they gain nothing from telling the complicated and messy truth.
God here come the inbred brain cells…
If either of you cared you would be aware that first world countries contributed most to the environmental problems. It’s always the biggest problem with climate politics, why should emerging countries share the blame equally to the oh so developed and enlightened countries when they’re the ones responsible for this. Should emerging countries and low income countries just do nothing and not develop as developed countries continue to dump their toxic waste and trash in the poorer and politically weaker countries?
Lmao single countries like China and India releasing outrageous amounts of CO2 only for it to be put in some faggy woke graph next to 28 European countries aggregated and a whole continent
Imagine defending shitholes like china and india, do you even know what kind of shit happens here?
Wouldn't be surprised if you support troon rights on top of that or equally something stupid.
Nona, you can look up the raw data of carbon output from volcanos now and from roughly the last century, as well as the raw data of carbon output by country. So yeah, don't believe everything you read on the internet and look up the facts yourself.
>>207845>Should emerging countries and low income countries just do nothing and not develop as developed countries
Yes. Sorry you missed the boat, but the world literally cannot handle the amount of pollution that would be created by undeveloped nations taking the same route as industrialized nations.
This, or at least shut up about it as long as you keep dumping literal shit, corpses and tons of chemicals and plastic into your rivers while westerners are terrorized into drinking from paper straws.
did you actually read the graph or just look at the big and small shapes
Congratulations you fail to understand why climate politics always comes to a gridlock!
Also you’re an idiot if you think people from emerging countries are threatening privileged westerners into using paper straws.
>>208030>Also you’re an idiot if you think people from emerging countries
I don't. Someone is doing it, but it comes from within.
I read it, which is why I understand what it means despite the misleading grouping and hilariously bad layout.
This. The U.S. started wising the fuck up in the 70's with regards to pollution and recycling. Meanwhile China was opening up to the west, and has gone unregulated and unchallenged for decades. Don't even get me started on India and southeast Asia.
nah tbh the future is the nightmare of the incel, it will be a completely "looksmaxxing" (how incels say it) society like south korea, south korea is reflecting the future in many ways culturally.
I wonder if a lot of women will just abandon the internet because it's not normal or healthy to constantly see the toxic thoughts of men from around the world. For example I used to spend a lot of time browsing youtube but I barely go on there now because I don't feel comfortable with redpill videos on there.
>>208040>>207976>>208040>if you live in a poor nation just stay poor forever while us westerners can live a cush life lmao
Also, if you're already blaming developing nations as part of the global climate and environmental problems then you have no idea what you're talking about and why we got into this mess in the first place.
I think we'll have something more of a Transmetropolitan world, with several beauty canons around and several subcultures. Of course, each will work on the basis that your body is imperfect and you should better it according to the latest fad, and it will be hellish.
new zealand decriminalised prostitution and it has done only good for the women involved. free std tests, condoms, contraceptive, police assistance where needed and obviously abortion is legal and easy to access too. they have to operate out of a registered house/brothel which also aids in their safety and less exploitation. you do not see them on the streets here or getting into random cars. I think it is unfortunate that moids in other countries ruin it for many women worldwide
this is the most weak statement i've ever heard in my life. its like saying oh i don't want to read books from the library because there are books about serial killers there….
youtube has algorithims, you can change it at your own will.
What % of prostitutes in New Zealand is white New Zealander?
It should be legalized entirely so that sex workers can become eligible for things like unemployment, maternity leave etc
I'm convinced that radfems who say that driving prostitution into an underground black market is good for sex workers are concern trolling and are really more just mad at the idea of coombrained moids getting to buy sex without penalty
Fuck that noise. I don’t want you to encourage that shit. I want women to get empowered, not treated like a porn star. That’s no better the burka wearing home sitting women in the ms. Get a real job you loser
I didn't say they have to stay poor forever, just that they can't take the planet destroying route that most industrialized nations have taken. Besides, the coal supply is not what it was 200 years ago, how would they take the same route when the supply no longer exists?
Germany has legalized prostitution and they deny women food stamps and housing vouchers if the woman is unwilling to do sex work. If you think it would rapidly turn into that, you're wrong.
Retarded, if you were to truly legalize it you need to enforce occupational safety rules like them wearing PPE like a medical professional (contact with bodily fluids), and no moid would tolerate that. Even then it's impossible to enforce those standards because prostituted women are literally being penetrated and even with condoms you can't fully prevent STDs.
Or they can find another job that doesn't require selling consent to moids.
There should really be more talk about no-experience or no degree jobs that first start off paying so-so wages, but you can advance in, like trades or security positions. I feel like women wouldn't be so pressured to become prostitutes if they knew that there were other options available besides work at mcdonalds and abrely afford rent or spend endless time and money she likely doesn't have getting a degree
The library isn't constantly pushing those books on me, it's easy for me to avoid a section I don't like. The youtube algorithm is known to push certain types of videos regardless of your personal tastes. Similarly I don't mind using Reddit despite all the cancerous stuff on there because it's easy to go only to the subs I like, but I deleted Twitter because they kept "recommending" inflammatory tweets from people I didn't follow onto my timeline.
I agree, and this is gonna be an unpopular opinion on here but imo I think as women that we have to get tougher. Men never tear each other down for stupid differences in opinion like we do, just shrug shit off and move on. I hate how every female only community inevitably spirals into infighting and pearl clutching mean girl antics, we have got to grow thicker skin and be more strategic in the way we approach things.
Because men feel like they can beat us down either way, and run down everything in their path. They stand up for nothing sacred and theyre very frequently parasitic. A lot of women "pearlclutch" because theyre tired as fuck of this dynamic and the pickme scum who pander to said men. They ruin it for the rest of women. I feel like the pickme kind tends to infight about everything no matter what it is because they're accustomed to low tier social existence already.
They said the same thing about pornography, which is essentially a form of prostitution. It doesn't "empower" women. It legalises the commodification of women's bodies and puts them under the control of male owned companies, much like pornography. It is men who will make money off it while women are forced to endure physical and mental abuse from customers.
Because China and India have more people each than the whole EU. Global warming is much more an economic than political issue. Its actually quite hilarious when people get angry at countries like India or China for making large (but still lesser) pollution than US/EU, because it implies that emissions output should be equal between countries. But I suppose countries like Luxembourg will be very glad to know that can pollute as much as the US.
Oh that's good. I'm going to remember that every time I feel lazy.
I just found out about r/sexpositivehomes. It's a bunch of people talking about how they watch porn with their kids and have sex in front of them, it's disturbing.
I remember this, they got into some drama a while ago. I can't remember exactly what happened but they were mass reported and privated to protect their sub. In the end they unprivated and the reporting did literally nothing and they're back to posting their pedo fanfics. Reddit admins looked at the subreddit themselves and thought "this is fine!! this is not dangerous and borderline illegal at all!!" and left them alone. But they'll ban radfem and terf subreddits because nooo remember the human!!1 reddit is safe space for everybody (including pedos apparently)!!\ just not for radfems. Remember how long jailbait was up? Sexpositivehomes isn't the first of its kind but every single time
a radfem subreddit is made the admin's unpaid dick suckers (againsthatesubreddits) and their wifebeating, child support dodging, tranny dictator bardfinn (who, by the way, admitted to posting cp on burner accounts to get "hate subreddits" shut down) point their lasers at it the second they get word of its existence.
Wtf. Having sex in front of children is actual sexual abuse, those kids should be taken from them.
This is literally my motivation mantra every day, very based.
watching a documentary called Four Wives-One Man. It's about a man, his four wives, and his mum, all living together in Iran.
>"I did not want him to have a second wife. He fell in love again and again, he beat me and I had to relent. He chose his cousin"
Second wife immediately after
>"I did not want to get married but my parents wanted it"
All the women multiple times throughout the documentary
>"he is so kind~"
I'm still watching Four Wives-One Man and he's just beat one of them with a shepherd stick because she needs spackle, quite literally says "it feels like I'm going to die when I sit down" because he destroyed her tailbone, so she's asking for a love potion to give to him. I really do weep for women in these countries
can't they do anything? Will their suffering just continue forever?
Ayrt well it's almost over and the fourth wife has just told us that she has attempted to set herself on fire three times, and a little while before this a different wife said he beats her so badly the neighbours had to rescue her on several occasions. He also apparently hates all his kids which is surprisingly twist because he wants a fifth wife for the purpose if having more kids
>>215362>the fourth wife has just told us that she has attempted to set herself on fire three times
at that point, if you're ready to check out of the world why not set him on fire too?
I have no because there's four women vs one beer belly retard, I honest to God think they could murder him if they didn't resent eachother
I apologise for flooding the thread a bit but the fifth wife is introduced at the very end and the screen fades to black as she says "love will give us a good life". I feel disgusted that I know she likely lived a life of abuse too
isn't four is the limit for muslims
I have no idea what the limit is but there's 5 by the end of it
It's 4 vs 1 and they don't do anything? I have no sympathy for women who like being oppressed.
I know it's insensitive and I feel awful saying this as someone who has never been through what they've been through but I can't help but think that women enduring beating and letting that violent man breed with them contributes for the patriarchy even if they don't intend to, that's just what keep the system alive. I understand that they're poor and that the entire society and the law system is against them but fighting back is surely better than a lifetime of beating and humiliation no matter the outcome of such rebellion.
There are two very upsetting scenes in the documentary, the first being one of the wives offering her 9(ish) year old son a wife by buying the neighbour girl and the second being another one if the wives weeping as her toddler daughter is promised to a little boy who forcibly kisses her and (bizarrely at his age, he couldn't be older than 7) verbally objects to the idea of the little girl growing up to study while married to him. I believe the weeping wife is indicative of them being aware of how wrong things are, but to them this is the only way and it's quite literally hammered into them as children to accept this kind of gender based abuse/oppression. These women all genuinely love the fat abusive scrote and are very open about how upset they are when he brings home a new wife. It's all very strange how they never once fathom fighting back against him but actually threaten to murder other wives instead
They've been taught from a young age to believe that they're going to hell if they don't love their husband and submit to him. That's abrahamic religions for you
>>215441>promised to a little boy who forcibly kisses her and (bizarrely at his age, he couldn't be older than 7) verbally objects to the idea of the little girl growing up to study while married to him
nuke this whole country jfc
HEAVY CHAINSAW MAN SPOILERS
I'm really late, but yes kind of, Makima hates Denji and is only manipulating him, but she wants Chainsaw Man (the REAL Chainsaw Man) to love her and that is the main reason behind everything she's doing.
She sees everyone else beneath her which makes it impossible for her to feel truly loved by anyone with the only exception being Chainsaw Man whom she sees above her. It extends to the point where she'd even be okay with him killing and devouring her because she's "his biggest fan".
If you ever feel depressed, just google your state along with "prostitution bust". It's so satisfying seeing these moids mugshots after the consequences of their actions catch up with them.
evolution doesn't care about human rights. if submissiveness to moid abuse leads to more offspring surviving and reproducing, nature will select for it. it's hard to view women who let moids walk all over them as my intellectual equal but I do have a lot of sympathy for them. a lot of times the alternative is death, jail time, or other horrific punishments
t. knows a woman spending life in jail for killing her disgusting husband
That did make me smile. 12 men were arrested last month, and 3 human trafficking victims were saved
So we can have paranormal horrors but not actual domineering woman, no she has to be insane.
Thats really disappointing and boring.
Every time you cheer for totalitarianism or authoritarianism, remember roe v wade and all pro tranny laws.
You are cheering for that too.
This may be a hot take, but:
an actual domineering woman who is flatly domineering over all dimensions (interpersonal, intellectual, sexual), even if not written by a moid who just wanted to cum, would be an unbelievably boring character with neither depths to explore nor capacity for character growth/journey.
In contrast, psychopathic idiot girl has the inherent character tension of balancing being a psychopath with being an idiot.
I've got to ask two questions, would you be okay with children bringing their prostitute mothers to career day in schools and even recommending it to children when they get old enough? And if you were a prostitute, would you let your parents watch you work or vice versa if they went into the business?
>I'm convinced that radfems who say that driving prostitution into an underground black market is good for sex workers are concern trolling and are really more just mad at the idea of coombrained moids getting to buy sex without penalty
I don't call every person with a different opinion than me a scrote but this is very male thinking.>These women are very upset about a problem that affects women…It must be because they hate my male happiness
Please watch this woman's videos and educate yourself on prostitution and the effects it has. It's been legal in Germany for a long time and it's been horrible for prostitutes.
>>216572>taking away my hookers is totalitarianism
Moid take lmao
Seriously? This isn't women making their own choices, this is men exploiting and pimping out women, many of which are trapped in prostitution and abused. Its human trafficking. Laws you don't like aren't muh totalitarianism.
I will say I am for prostitution being legal, I think prostitution is terrible for women, don't get me wrong, but prostitution will happen regardless and if its legal then women in prostitution can have more protections.