/b/ - Random

more earthshattering news next please

don't really see what's so absurd about what he's describing. does he think prostitutes didn't exist back then too? or their pimps didn't die?

I can't help but think they had to be heavily sexually abused as children and now they think their utmost value is being fuckable and earning money from it.

I have nothing but empathy for prostituted/trafficked women and girls but when it comes to onlyfans I can't help but feel pure disgust, even though I know a lot of them are being pimped out as well

And then you realize moids will always ignore and overlook any abuse towards prostitutes and spin it around and make themselves the victim, and pain onlyfans and prostitution as a whole as something feminism created lmao

>>318926
Prostitutes used to know that they were prostitutes. Bars and club pay Instagram celebrities to make women want to go in them, which they can do for free, and then they charge 10 grands a night to a moid so he can get the table that have been made popular.
This is still prostitution.

Start creating more job options for people and lower general life expenses. You can't live on a $800 a month income in the US just like you can't live on a 800€ a month income in some parts of Europe, like a perpetual student
A teacher of philology in California at the UC Berkeley earns $1600 a month and then pays $1200 a month for rent

>>318942
that does not help his point

>>318944
Not even about that, she's just a companion

the internet made whoring easier, at least to access a wider audience. it's not some "microcosm of modernity": that's such a dramatic line. it's really just evidence of how great the internet is at revealing human nature. nothing new is happening, because whores have always existed. if anything, they're doing less disgusting jobs than escorts because OF models aren't by implication required to touch the clients (some do, but many pay for msgs to be written by assistants, and use actors for "meetups with fans.")
he's trying to word it like something big and planned is happening, because he doesn't live in the real world. he's obsessed with looking down dark corners (and naturally it's always the ones involving naked slutty women.) no, it's not "feminism" you scatty little rat. you think that because you'd rather plunge dickfirst into porn and reactionary retardation than feminist literature. he's baiting an implied conversation about jewish control of porn (true), but is too lazy to focus on it, and instead wants to slyly frame feminism as the perpetrator (even if just for outrage, or to shove as many latch-points into his post as he can.) so as he shows: men love taking digs at women, more than they hate even their alleged suppressors, the big bad joos. these pornstars have all been molested, and wouldn't do their jobs without payment and attention. they're mentally ill.

>>318956
>these pornstars have all been molested, and wouldn't do their jobs without payment and attention. they're mentally ill.

what makes you say that? plenty of women join the industry because they like it, it's easy work

>>318957
apparently i absorbed a false rhetoric. they don't have a higher chance of having been molested. at least, not significantly more than on average. i was under the impression that there'd be a connection, but i was wrong and didn't check before i posted.
but yea, when i think of molested women, i subconsciously associate the word with all of the ones that've absorb male-approval as essential to their survival. like they've been touched by an option in life and can't take it back due to over relying on it. it's a personal mental thing, so not the right use of the word; but strong enough to convey how repulsive the entire topic feels to me. but that's personal, so i probably shouldn't use the word if there's no actual connection