why do people like uncle toms? Anonymous 114692
before explaining, i just want to preface that i am mildly drunk, so apologies if this post isn't written or cohesive, but i hope the point gets across.
i'd like to mention that even though the term "uncle tom" is racial and stems from a racial context, the concept spans across race, gender, age, and any other markers of "identity." the other day i was watching a video from some millennial complaining about zoomers and the top comment was some zoomer saying something along the lines of, "i totally agree with you. zoomers SUCK and i am different, here's why." so, i don't imagine that being an uncle tom is particularly isolated towards the idea of race.
i'd also like to mention, that yes, all of us participate in uncle tom like behavior to some degree. maybe we betray our prosocial, collectively presented opinion a little bit in private - that is normal, i think. but i don't think it's a good thing, necessarily.
the weird thing is how defensive people get over uncle toms. the people that support their uncle tom behavior because, i don't even know really. why? they don't stand for anything. their whole schtick is that they just cater to our repressed desires even if they persist malicious social systems. is there an important role for that? maybe, but i don't genuinely like them as people.
i get that people don't always have to be PC and prosocial and im not someone that genuinely hates them or anything. i just don't get why people support uncle tom behavior. its not even particularly healthy to be an uncle tom yourself, because you would only be important to others if you play a role. not because you are a human being that has their own desires and thoughts.
does that make sense? i just don't get it. it's wrong to support uncle tom behavior or be one yourself, from my perspective.
Anonymous 114693
and again
i don't hate these people. i get that not everything in life is about being collectively prosocial. but
i guess i just dont really understand my feelings towards them.
Anonymous 114695
>>114692It's an extremely nuanced issue, but for the most part people "like" them because they're easy pawns in ideological arguments.
>"See? Even some black people agree!">"There are traditional and submissive women out there"I would still argue that criticism of "your side" is a
good thing and should be practiced readily, I don't believe in absolutism, unquestioning commitment to a cause is very dangerous. But it should be used to improve things on your end, not as leverage for the opposing party.