/nsfw/ - xxx

why is everyone here obsessed with boyfriends

i thought this was a gemstone hobbyist forum

>>1456
I thought it meth restaurant. A methstaurant if you will.

>>1454
I'm praying for your soul, OP.

>>1454
ewww, enjoy anal prolapse, rips, and infection.

Welp. I didn't want to participate but you've all forced my hand.

why dont you anal lol its good your so wrong

Nothing wrong with buttsecks and it feels quite nice. This seems a pointless thread though as most men in the year of our lord 2018 would be willing to do this, it's more a matter of finding a bf or not. Now finding one who would actually tongue there, that's much more rare.

Male detected.

I've literally never met a woman who was into anal.

>>1461
You aren't an authority on what women think and want based off your own experiences talking to them…

We exist.

>>1461
I suspected as much. The phrasing in OP is weird, like they're on the prowl for women who do anal.

>>1463
This.

We literally have "pregnancy fetish" threads but anal is just too farfetched, lol

I know, so few men are into pegging. Hurts me.

I thought most men liked it? How come you can't find one?

>>1466
Came here to type this.

What does anal feel like?

>>1469
Not OP but it's just excruciatingly painful. I heard that some gay men take painkillers to cope. At best, it just feels like taking a big shit and unless you orgasm while taking a shit, you're not going to get any sexual pleasure out of that.

>>1470
I have a gay friends that always tell me about their hookups and I've never heard of it being so painful that they need to take painkillers. It doesn't make sense, if it's painful to the extent of that then it would mean its fucking up their body.

>>1469
Only sharing personal experience, your mileage may vary.

It will feel a bit like taking a shit at first, each instance it always took a minute or two of warming up to start to feel sensational and less like that. Only a few times was the pain excruciating, and I mean absolutely brought me to tears agony, but that was because of an accident where my ex-bf had a 'slipping' accident and it all slid in from too much lubricant way faster than the muscles were ready for. I think I cried in the bathroom for 5 minutes after that one from all the pain. So you have to be careful.

But done right it just feels like sex, the "full feeling" as some will describe feels so hot. Physically you're hitting like a backwall of the same nerve endings in your vagina, it's different for men and women(as men have a g-spot there in their anatomy). For this reason some have found it boring and dull and just something their bf wanted, but earlier this year an anon here on CC was talking about how quickly it can start feeling incredible and I agree.

It's not for everyone. You're not going to prolapse unless you were some homosexual man-whore tier and did it all week several times although it is a terrifying thought and a legitimate concern. It's obviously not really something your body is meant to do. I understand I'm outside the norm for liking it. I wouldn't even encourage anyone to get into it due to the risks and the fact that god gave us other routes to be intimate with each other.

>>1474
very practical reminder to only use your butt for what it's meant for. anal is very normalized through porn but there is nothing normal about it.

>>1472
I think anon is talking about poppers/laughing gas, not painkillers but it's a booty relaxant that gets you high

>>1474
that's still a low percentage of those engaging in anal.

>>1475
it existed long before pornography however

>>1477
so did child sex slaves and puppy stomping

>>1478
Anal sex between consenting adults doesn't have a victim.

Nobody uses "porn has normalized it" as an argument against child sex slavery and puppy stomping, they're argued against on moral grounds.

>>1479
fine, i think jamming a dick into a poophole is morally wrong then. it doesn't have to be on a list of top 10 worst sins for me to decide that. and clearly it's wrong for health reasons.

>>1480
How is it morally wrong? In no logical way can private acts that affect no one else be deemed immoral, only on religious "sex is for procreation only" grounds.

>>1481
it's morally wrong because i feel it is. and it is affecting others, this unhealthy act is being normalized and spread by people who are doing it. it's also spreading hiv.

My issue is the exact opposite, my bf is only into anal and coming on my face / tits when all I want is him to impregnated me but he absolutely refuses due to fear even if im on pills. Obviously I don't want kids yet as I'm way too young and unsure in my bf in general but its still very frustrating honestly.

Feels very bad honestly.

>>1482
homosexual men spread HIV, anal itself is not to blame

>>1484
Guns don't kill people–people do.

>>1481
>Anal sex between consenting adults doesn't have a victim.
Presupposing that the rightness or wrongness of an action is solely determined by its outcome assumes a consequentialist morality, but people who are anti-buttsecks have a natural law view of morality where things are "natural" on the basis of whether or not they contribute to human flourishing. For people who hold that the proper function of secks is to be unitive and procreative, sticking it in the pooper frustrates those ends and is thus immoral.

https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2012/10/whose-nature-which-law.html

https://www.iep.utm.edu/natlaw/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism

>>1486
Austromom pls

>>1486
>but people who are anti-buttsecks have a natural law view of morality

This is not necessarily true. One can imagine an individual who objects from a consequentialist perspective: for instance, maybe they are concerned about the rate of new HIV transmissions in a population, and they can show that rates of anal sex are related with the risk of transmission.

>>1466
I third this anon

>>1461
She wants to peg him you FUCKING RETARD

>>1491
If you loved someone you would not traumatize their internal anal sphincter

>>1492
Stimulating his prostate comes with a risk, but so long as he consents the reward is worth it.

>>1485
Ridiculous comparison. AIDS risk for heterosexuals(and lesbians) not involved with needle sharing is so astronomically low it might as well not exist as a disease for us. AIDS is almost entirely their problem and not ours and it's more from the hypersexual degenerate and reckless lifestyle of theirs. If I was going to contract AIDS from anal I'd get it from PiV from the same man.

>>1494

Anal actually comes with higher risk of transmission of disease than piv due to the likelihood of trauma

>>1507
Just get your partner tested then there's no risk.
What a retarded argument.

>>16128
>>16147
>>16240

No judgement here, but what do you get out of it? Is it just a power thing? Or something more… visceral?

anal gross

My bf is. Except he wants to do me, not me to do him.
I don't understand why men want anal so badly, I just can't imagine it. If I was a gay man, or some ultra stacy, maybe. But I'm sexually conservative as fuck. That shit's vile, it's unhealthy and it hurts probably.

>>1847
It's unironically porn. It's turning straight men (and some women) into ass/anal fiends.

>>1852
I'm aware, sadly. I also found out he might be into pegging since I posted that. Not sure how I feel.

My bf is super, super into anal. And he's not one of those 'ugh you have to have an enema' guys either, he doesn't mind getting any shit on him at all. In all honesty, he thinks getting streaked with it is kind of hot, although he'd never go any further with scat at all. I had a bad experience with an ex who pinned me down and put pins in my cheeks, so i never had looked into anal again, but he kind of reintroduced me and now im even willing to lick him clean for the taboo.

is that gross? sounded gross lol

>>1461
KHHV here, so maybe this doesn't go beyond a weird fantasy due to loneliness, but you CAN be a woman and have a interest in butt stuff.

>>1466
BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED

>>5802
>is that gross?
Little bit, but you do you sis.

>>1454
why the fuck would you want that, freak