>>8433 you do not need to be submissive if you want a man, you probably would want a good one who is also not too masculine let's use chinese terms for this kind of polarity; yang being male and yin being female if you are about 60% yin and 40% yang, he should probably be around 60% yang and 40% yin
>>8433 I think that a lot of women feel that way. If you find a guy who isn't porn-sick (less than 10% of guys probably), you can have sweet passionate sex with lots of kissing in the missionary position.
Being submissive is almost like a kind of self harm. If you're not into it, congrats for the great self-esteem. Find yourself a normal man or a man who you can lead around and have normal sex with him. If you're not into PIV then just don't do it, there are many other ways for men and women to have sex.
There’s nothing wrong with being penetrated, that’s female biology. Sex doesn’t have to be submissive vs dominant or humiliating or whatever nonsense men have made it into. Free yourself of male ideology and don’t play into it.
>>8767 Maybe it's even the wording of "being penetrated" (passive voice) that turns many women off. What if we reframed it as "enveloping a penis/dildo" for example?
>>8433 recently ive been almost completely turned off to the idea of being penetrated with a penis, though i still want to cuddle/kiss/do hand stuff with a man or a woman. sometimes i even think about strap-on stuff, but the flesh and blood penis going into my vagina is starting to skeeve me out. it just seems so gross and unnecessary and unappealing. i wonder if you can relate or others can? ive also noticed that the less i watch porn, the less ive been interested in penetration.