>>14578Men are not really human and do not ever really rise to the moral level of animals or living beings in general, since a puppy's existence and presence in an owner's life is more or less self-justifying. This is very difficult for highly maternal women to understand since there is a strong temptation to think of sons as though they were self-justifying like puppies. But that thought process is disordered and we even have the term "boymom" for that specific delusion.
The proper frame of reference for a male is a mechanism.
Our human relationship to mechanisms is purpose-driven.
A machine for harvesting crops is a productive farming implement and a man who harvests crops for you is likewise useful.
A malfunctioning but productive machine requires either repair or replacement.
Now, when it comes to sex. When you think of a device that is used for sex, there are two varieties. The kind that is used to facilitate sex with another person (definitionally with a woman, see above), and the kind that is used without another person. These two varieties should not be confused for each other.
Some men might be useful in facilitating sex between two women or as proxies for intimacy with another woman, but those are rare. Usually a man is the shameful secret to be hidden in the lockable drawer away from friends or partners' eyes. And with that kind of device in mind, be honest - would you rent or buy a used vibrator? One that had probably seen multiple tours through other women's butts when they were feeling experimental?