>>4725
I'm still pretty new to the site so I wasn't sure if I should make a separate thread or post this in here since it is a relevant topic - my apologies if I should've made my own thread
So this is regarding the friend finder thread or just people posting discord tags and contact info on the site in general. Rule 7 says we can’t call out male posters but what about in the case of them posting discord tags? Like in the friend finder thread the only way a male will get banned is if someone else who had added him posts a screenshot of message logs where he admits he is male. Since reporting him without any proof would be considered a false report I'm assuming, making posting the message logs and calling him out necessary. Is there a way we can have an exception to this rule or something? Also maybe to call out males who lurk and add miners but don't actually post their tags. It’s disheartening posting contact info expecting majority who add to be other girls and instead it’s mostly creepy male lurkers. Being able to post their tags/info so we can preemptively block them before they are even able to add us would help avoid being harassed via messages by them.

>>4891
Sheesh, didn't see that rule. That's rough. I hope the mods respond to you.

Now I really wish there was a against defending creepy things (i.e., pedophilia). So people can literally just report and move on.

>>4892
Same, I hope so too. I just want to be able to make friends with other girls and not have to filter through messages from weird males lol I'm sure others feel the same

>>4725
it seems like there's a lot of meta drama in the friend finder thread as the mods keep on deleting posts of people calling out moids and I think this is very bad as it puts the safety of the girls there at risk.

can we have a meta general thread where we can post such warnings? (or is there one)

>>4895
>mods keep on deleting posts of people calling out moids and I think this is very bad as it puts the safety of the girls there at risk.

Yikes. We mightve got one in the mod team, Otherwise why would you even make that rule, especially since
anons provided proof they're moids.

>>4849
yeah, and it spirals out of control.

maybe the actual real option is to ignore whatever poster seems creepy which I have trouble doing n I'm guilty about it. T_T

>>4864
It's not, we've been asking for containment threads to be enforced over and over again for months now. Some people don't wanna get the memo, so they get banned. That's what bans are for. It's fine, it's not shameful or embarrassing to be banned. You'll be back.

>>4849
I kind of think the mods should make a rule against stuff like defending pedophilia, rape, etc. It's always pedantic and dumb and goes nowhere and as you say, it really is a huge moid indicator.

In turn, I feel like there'd be less dumb arguments over it.

>>4838
I didn’t get a reason for my bad :(

>>4868
Refer to this post >>4842 at most these things deserve a warning.

>>2323
Looks like the male version of myself.

>>2324
I'd suck his dick for some LINK tokens

Make it a place for shadowbanning. Moids who post there would get a secret ban.

>>2281
i don't even hate men but I don't see the need for this

I agree with this sentiment whole-heartedly. /b/ literally has two cyclicals dedicated to talking about hating moids and troon penis for god's sake. The two most active threads on the entire board revolve around penis either inside or outside of a skirt.

I’ve already replied here but whatever. This place was supposed to be all the good things about a chan minus all the bad things that come with scrote inhabited spaces. Instead, we have another woman forum but guys guys guys omg wait for it: it’s hecking anonymous!!

To see the absolute state of the board, compare the activities in male-related threads and all the other ones. Pathetic.

This has been discussed several times and it's the reason we have a stickied thread with extra rules on /b/ and /feels/. Please report threads that violate these rules and create the threads you want to see.

>>4839
On /b/ or the site in general? Seems a bit too restrictive for /media/ for example.

>>4841
That's because the staff bans all discussion centered around women. So unless you can somehow convince Admin to start actively banning all posts and threads concerning men, you're going to have to suck it up (and maybe bump the non-moid threads you're interested in). You can also go to lol.cow where they talk about moids slightly less than here.

>>4789
>transwomen are included in the no men rule
>Transmen are female so they can participate
based

>>4789
This is false, troons get banned immediately.
Men in a dress =/= female

>>4792
reread my post slower

>>4788
Why does it have to be either?

>>4788
This is a TERF climate, which means extremely liberal except when it comes to the subjects of transgenderism and men, then it's reactionary and politically incorrect. Overall, this place is liberal, but edgy, if you know what I mean. You can't discuss any kind of politics that isn't identity politics btw.

>>1520
To be more specific, we're actually using a customized fork of Tinyboard, which vichan is itself a fork of: https://github.com/savetheinternet/Tinyboard

>>1161
Admin, I noticed that this imageboard doesn't have the readonly JSON interface enabled. This interface is very useful for writing mobile phone applications that can interface with imageboard software:-

https://github.com/vichan-devel/vichan-API/

I was attempting to add support for crystal cafe to a modified version of Kuroba I was working on (primarily for another site), would enabling the JSON inteface be a possibility?

Many Thanks

lmao I just noticed the thread photo is horribly photoshopped

Hello I also would like to request API pretty please.
> $config['api']['enabled'] = true;
>>2628

>>1161
is it possible to contribute to crystal.cafe? I'm a full stack web developer, always looking for a new project, would love to help out

I like being able to look through older threads too but it's seems a bit much for there to be 2000 of them in the catalog. Also, it would make sense to have them locked them after a certain point.
It would be nice if there was an option to just display only the first 100 or so while still keeping the other archived for anyone who's interested.

>>4516
Yes. I think there should be an /archive/ board for old threads, maybe >6 months old.

>>4516
I'm pretty sure the main reason we do not have an archive system yet is because of how low the site's traffic is compared to bigger imageboards such as 4chan. I'm pretty sure that with more people here the archive system could absolutely be implemented. But I do share the same sentiment, the catalog on /b/ is pretty big…

>>4516
>>4520
The catalog on /b/ is four times that of some of the larger imageboards, while having a fraction of the population of those websites.

>>4519
>>4520
Maybe I'm alone in thinking this but rather than having an archive I think it's better to just prune old threads. It keeps things fresh and doesn't make people hesitate to start an active new conversation just because there's an old dead thread with a vaguely similar topic.

Are there any other banned words, admin?

It's not just you OP. I'm another that got perma'd with no reason given a long while back. Came here to chime in in the thread you linked only to get my new IP instantly permad upon trying to reply as well. My post did not contain the word you mentioned as banned either. What the actual fuck is going on lol

>>4504
Just wanted to say me too, I've been posting in this thread about it >>>/meta/4434
I was wondering if it was an auto ban because sometimes I didn't even post before getting the notification I was banned that day. I've definitely had the word "p* thetic" in my posts lol

Remember a while back when we had continuous raids from that schizo who would spam the same post or variations thereof over and over? I ended up banning a bunch of phrases he used, including misogynistic insults and, at some point, the word 'pathetic', reminding myself to remove that one later because it's too common. Guess what I did. I'm really sorry, it's fixed, I'd refund you if I could.

Other banned words are references to CP sites, other sites that like to spam ads here, commonly spammed Discord handles, and various moid memes often used during raids.

>>4512
>I ended up banning a bunch of phrases he used, including misogynistic insults and, at some point, the word 'pathetic', reminding myself to remove that one later because it's too common. Guess what I did. I'm really sorry, it's fixed, I'd refund you if I could.
Understandable, have a nice day and thank you for correcting that.

>>4397
femenine dude > femboy trash
Femboy has too much disgusting internet coomer moid centered culture attached to it. It's the kinda threads that encourages these types of moids to interact too, so I understand why the admins would not want these threads.

>>4398
do u feel this way about butch women/tomboys too?

>>4399
what word should i use to describe feminine dudes if not "femboy", like…i just want to lavish praise on pretty men

I can understand it. AGPs think they can get their foot in the door if you admit that a fictional anime boy with long hair is cute. Then they can wheedle you down to playing along with their trap fantasies. It's not going to work but they're going to shit up the board trying it.

Consider making a /media/ thread about a SPECIFIC femboy character? Or find an existing thread for photos of IRL men if you want to talk about specific twitter traps.

>>4402
Literally answered your own question, juste call them femenine dudes. Adding "boy" to it makes it sound infantilizing too.

>>4232
Men are attention whores who almost always reveal themselves on here

I think half of this site is made of moid posters

>>4277
Damn he thick

>>4277
I'd give it 25% moid, 75% actual female. Who could as retarded as a moid? Generally though, you can tell.

>>4190
i agree. tumblr users probably won't raid. just promote it to your mutuals