Comment limits Anonymous Admin 
3057[Reply]
I've seen some users comment on how long our threads stay up and how it might be detrimental. Our board is slow and seldom-used threads quickly drop off the first pages, which then makes it harder to find them again, which leads to more duplicate threads. I'm considering adjusting the comment limit to something more reflective of our activity and archiving old threads after a while.
However, this would mean making new threads all the time even though the old ones weren't even close to full, and starting over with the same conversation.
Do you like the current limit or are you in favor of shorter threads?
10 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.Anonymous Admin 3089
>>3088The userscript and extension both do the same thing, except the userscript lets you modify it to add crystal.cafe. You can probably run them both, but it would be pointless.
Anonymous 3378
What happened to the old threads? I have been here since the start. This is a slow site so I check the threads every few months?
Also, there are poster that are autistically irritating. They make these know-it- all post. The site will always suffer into those people leave.
Anonymous Admin 3379
>>3378They should still be there unless the OP got their post history removed. Recently I've been sparing thread OPs from mass-deletion though, for the sake of contributing anons.
Anonymous 12738
Does anyone know what the max amount of thread replies can be? Like how on Lolcow.Farm you're supposed to prepare a new thread at 1100 posts, you can't bump it after 1200, and you can't reply after 1208? What's the equivalent for those here?
