/x/ - /x/

Fluoride is bad for the pineal gland

Not fully but quieting your mind and getting healthy can help you contact the spiritual more from what I know. Or maybe it's just hallucinations idk

fluorosis is a thing, but it's an affect of high exposure. the levels in our water are very low and our body isn't impacted. i think the theory may have something to do with how overexposure causes oxidative stress, which certainly degrades mental wellness. but you'd need to be guzzling the stuff specifically for any issue to arise

I don't rely on karma. If it's worth it I'll try to have my revenge, if it's something petty I'd rather forget it, why waste your energy on dumb shit

Uhh alright, I shall humbly share some of what I know:

So the word Karma, comes from Kar(action) and Man(to think). What does this mean?

As it's known, in many creeds there is the idea that God is everything and everyone, and so we are god experiencing ourselves. That would also mean that we have the ability to co-create the world together.

And Karma is exactly that: The result of our thoughts in the world. So if for example one says: "Oh I want a house", well because of your own divine ability to create (although most are unware of it while living human lives), you will start shaping the world so an opportunity of getting that which you wanted, comes. Now we tend to think of Karma as some divine judgment, because everything to exist needs it's positive and negative. So you get to have a house, but now you have to take care of it, so if something breaks, you have to pay. If a better job opportunity comes in another city, you have to stay because your house has a heavy tax connected to the bank, and all the many chores that owning a house can entail.

And all of this comes from a single thought. This is why they say "Becareful of what you wish"


Now you can learn to better handle your ability to create by becoming conscious of your unconscious thoughts, and that is when you transform your Karma in Dharma, from Dhar(to hold) and Man(thought), so it's basically the thoughts you are already aware of and thus are unlikely to come bite you later like the unconscious ones.

>>3394
I think I am being humbled by the universe. For saying and doing bad things. I believe this is part of everyone’s path. Little instances only known to them. There is not a single bad thing I’ve ever done that hasn’t come back to bite me somehow. Gets me to get my act together. I feel so embarrassed of myself.

>>3636
The extremely rich people like Elon Musk are unhappy because they have a mental illness that causes them to hoard excessively. At one point after a few millions you finally have the means to live a luxurious life, have money on the side for any health issues that may arise, travel, support your family, retire or quit working entirely and focus on your passions… The people who are this level of rich (and if you think a few millions aren't rich your minds have been wrapped) are surely happy. They understand when enough is enough and are good at managing their finances.

It could be nice if it were real but I don't hold out hope, it seems lots of people have managed to dodge karma even if it is real. Assuming its existence I doubt anyone can dodge it forever

Great thread, interesting topic. The UFO community is basically a fandom anyway.

>>10910
Are you talking about this thread? Underwater alien base?
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/34629564/
I think it was great and believable.

Yes. Universe is HUGEEEEEEE why would we be alone here?

I've read lots of conspiracies on them, from Starseeds, to Prison Planet stuff, to psychedelic encounters and DMT beings to abduction reports. The Roswell Alien Interview where Matilda o'donnell macelroy claimed to telepathically communicate with an alien named Ailr that was published by Lawrence R Spencer in 1947 is an interesting read. It was popular in Gnostic/Prison Planet circles for mentioning Samsara and Earth being where souls who got extremely bad Karma in past lives are reincarnated, there is some stuff about being infinitely recycled too. Apparently Matilda died shortly after she sent the author this. It may have been faked as the author is rumored to be part of Scientology but it's a chicken or the egg thing where he may have joined Scientology as it seemed to be the closest to truth or he possibly wrote this to help Scientology get its start. It's also suspected to be Scientology propaganda by using terms like "immortal spiritual beings/eternal spiritual beings" to describe humans as beings named IS-BE. This does cause suspicion from some that Scientology does seem to be "the elite" in one way or another. People on Reddit mentioned having similar encounters with gray aliens or mentioning that they were told the name of the book telepathically. There are some other interesting books of a similar nature by people like Karla Turner and there's others like Phil Schneider who was possibly killed for knowing too much. Don't know if I believe it but it does seem possible

Interesting Reddit posts
https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/14s2zlr/matilda_odonnell_macelroy_1947_roswell_interview/
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/xk4svt/alien_interview_lawrence_r_spencer_anyone_read/
https://www.reddit.com/r/InterdimensionalNHI/comments/1dv7onc/multiple_nonhuman_entities_have_told_humans_that/
https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/1fi2rd8/serious_roswelPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

This channel called Area 52 made some interesting videos about it

I think they're real, but that all of the sightings of them are bullshit. If there's any other life in our solar system it could only be either bacteria or marine life on Titan or Europa. As for life on exoplanets, even if there was life intelligent enough to build space craft that can travel thousands of light years away, why would they come to Earth to do nothing other than probe people in the ass? And I find it unlikely other life in the galaxy would be humanoid like how alien sightings always are.
Because the universe is so vast there has got to be other life out there though. In all the billions of years the universe has existed some other planets must have developed life as some point.

>>10309
Thank you for your reply. Is there a good book that resonates with you especially? One that has emphasis on mother divinity? A lot of books I come across are very masculine.

>>10310
i liked the book by zuzana budapest in the OP under dianic wicca. You'll see I took a lot of inspiration from her. Mary Daly is good too.
The one that most resonated with me and broke me out of the spell of lies was reading the gnostic version of genesis. I had been raised catholic but since very early realized that the god of the bible was evil. It is especially obvious in genesis: the lie that women were borne from man's rib (and not the other way around), the curses the male god places on humanity like flooding the earth or killing innocents in egypt. He is jealous and vengeful. very unlike a creator and more like a usurper trying to control a creation that is not his. Even from a young age it felt like a trick. Reading the gnosic version is much closer to the truth, though i think their conception of material reality as evil is an oversimplification. the thunder perfect mind is a poem from the nag hammadi library, i think, which has a lot of hidden truths.
Unfortunately lots of traditions about the mother divinity were passed down orally, suppressed, eliminated, or assimilated. If you look, youll find fragments of her in your own culture. Take these fragments and follow them. She is not a vengeful goddess, don't worry too much about doing things the perfect way, just do what you can and she will show you the rest. Ask the women in your family, look at the female figures in your religion, or even look to history or mathematics and philosophy. You'll find her.

About the flooding, according to Plato's work Timaeus in ancient times there where many floodings that actually destroyed civilisations and their accumulated knowledge which they where desparate to pass on to the future generations to the point that underground libraries where built like the ones in Egypt.

Can someone recommend me an introductory book?

This interests me but I struggle to believe any of it personally. Can anyone provide me with some evidence or proof that any of the supernatural is real? Or that there's more reason to believe in any of this than standard Christianity or Abrahamic Religions?

>>11971
I believe you can change and regulate small things like that over time by thinking about it hard (like in Dune). Do not look in the mirror for extended periods of time. Just do whatever it takes physically (eg wearing headphones for ears) and mentally to change. As for eyesight, avoid computer screens for a few days and especially when you wake up. Go outside and force yourself to read signs and stuff from afar. Put up a sheet of paper with random characters and try to read from as far as possible; then back up as you get better. You can do this at home. I think the body is much more flexible than most think. Over half of people have glasses; logically, shouldn't they have been culled out over thousands of years? I think they started with good eyesight and their eyes simply adjusted quickly and quasi-permanently when they started reading/going on a computer at a young age. If you force your body to another situation you should be able to reverse. Ofc, and this goes in general to anyone, eat well, drink well, run a couple of times a week and do a few pushups; and most importantly, work intellectually and/or read proper stuff. This changes you as a person (and thus your appearance too).

>>11972
I forgot to add that science actually shows people morphing over the years into their significant one; so such (admittedly slow) change is officially possible given the right context. But we also forget faces quickly. Hence my theory that if you don't look at yourself and strongly focus mentally on changing certain aspects you may be able to change yourself.

>>11972
Thank you for the reply

>wearing headphones for ears

Technically this doesn’t cause permanent change. But with miracles and placebo i guess it could

>>11974

I already hate mirrors :(

>>11896

how old were you then? how old are you now?

i don't believe you actually correlate any of these desires to love. i think you feel like you have to call these, or want to call these violent impulses 'love' to avoid seeing these impulses as what they obviously are: anger, isolation, alienation, and likely a very weak psyche.

it sounds like you don't think many people (if any) love you, including your parents - you probably don't interact with others enough to catch a glimpse of the spectrum of romance/sex/love or whatever - why the correlation to love?

>>11902
>how old were you then?
6-14
>how old are you now?
20s
>i think you feel like you have to call these, or want to call these violent impulses 'love' to avoid seeing these impulses as what they obviously are: anger, isolation, alienation, and likely a very weak psyche.
>why the correlation to love?
i know that those sadistic impulses stem from isolation and abuse and mental illness and whatnot, im not afraid to admit that because its a rather obvious conlusion, i just dont know what else to call them. like sometimes i will feel enamored by a person, i like thinking about them and having them on the backburner of my mind, i like how they look and i find them hot, but instead of wanting to make them happy all i think about is hurting them and i dont have any interest in doing anything else with them, when i stop having a crush on a person i stop wanting to hurt them. thats why i label those experiences as 'love', there just isn't any other catch-all term that describes the type of attachment that i feel

>>11907
NAYRT, but can you give us more insight into your crushes (since you mentioned you don't date)? are you usually friends with the people you've had crushes on? what about fictional/celebrity crushes?

>>11910
>are you usually friends with the people you've had crushes on?
not really. i kind of have a strange relationships with people in general, i dont usually like my friends as people and we talk exclusively about our shared hyperfixations (usually original characters or media) because i dont care about anything else. i talk to them as long as theyre willing to entertain my ideas and so in return i entertain theirs. its transactional to me. with crushes its different, theyre usually the type of person that id never be friends with because theyre usually not the artistic creative types and creating stuff is my only real interest
>what about fictional/celebrity crushes?
i dont get like that about celebs, usually because i dont find them interesting, but i sometimes have those crushes on fictional characters, tho not all of my attractions are fictional

>>11907
You can all but extinguish old/bad memories. That's why in the (((current era))) they keep talking about "opening up" and "embracing emotions" and so on. Because they want you to suffer. Once you've come to terms with what happened and have acknowledged it you can create a new reality; just experience as much as possible (both good books/media and in life) and ignore the old stuff. It'll get suppressed. The human mind is much more flexible and our mental strength more resilient than they'll let you know. It's also nice to have a proper goal in life (ie working towards something concrete and materially relevant).

>>8697
>>11934
Why do you believe that in order to permashift or respawn you first need to die? I never read it was necessary.

>>11944
i see, i'm honestly pretty skeptical when it comes to second-hand accounts like that, anyone could say anything.

>>11949
i would be happiest if there was nothing after death. none of the options given by major religions is satisfying.

>>11964
tbh i don't think it is, however the respawn community i was apart of for years was based on death-based reincarnation. however, it wasn't like you commit suicide then you reincarnate and more like you undergo the spiritual reincarnation first and then your body dies in the way you scripted. either way, i was a depressed teen and thought i wanted to die so i rlly liked the idea.

>>11965
>i would be happiest if there was nothing after death. none of the options given by major religions is satisfying.
I agree that most afterlife ideas have holes in them but non-existence would be the worst. At least if there is something after death there's a way it could all maybe work out even if we can't comprehend it. Nothing after just feels so definitive

To be more in line with the topic of the thread I wonder if some form of quantum immortality is true, there are lots of stories of people who were about to get into head on car collisions yet they walked away completely unharmed with their cars having not even a dent. It's very odd

>>11964
what even is the difference between permashifting and respawning? Arent't they the same (both being shifting with intent to stay in ones desired reality)

>>11969
Respawning is usually coming back to the current timeline as a new person, permashifting is going to a different timeline as the same person

>>11908
I also wouldn't trust men to tripsit, I've seen many men admit that raping someone who's on drugs is their fantasy

>>11876
I had one by accident, I got weed that was laced with it. It was one of the worst experiences of my life. Literal hell dimension.

>>11926
Yeah I've heard lots of stories about people who feel like they visited the afterlife and how hellish trips make them never want to die

My theory based on stuff like near death experiences is that they have some underlying issues that causes their negative emotions to flare up and form into a realm/creatures but that's a complete conspiracy and I have no real proof for it honestly. Maybe it's a prison planet or it's just our brains being weird, who knows

>>11929
For me personally it felt very distinctly (don't ask me how I knew, I just did) that I was being trapped in a "punishment dimension" that was made out of every negative thing I ever did or thought or had happen to me, like a culmination of all the negative energy I ever encountered. I'm not spiritual in the slightest, I think it's interesting how drugs have very specific ways to interact with the human brain and I guess this is just what salvia does. I was trapped all alone in the universe knowing I would never have a human experience again like talking to friends or eating, I was fully isolated and removed from a physical body experience, and at the same time I could look around myself (not in the room I was in but drifting through a landscape) and everything was just covered with a thin veneer of normalcy but underneath I could see flesh pulsing. It was awful because I knew I was tripping and thought I had just smoked a normal joint, which wouldn't even get me super stoned usually, so I thought I had fried my brain the way you sometimes hear it with people who develop a weed psychosis or something. So I was 100% aware of what was going on and my only logical conclusion was that I was experiencing locked-in syndrome and wouldn't come out of it. I was visiting my mom at the time, and she woke up somehow and found me wheezing on the ground, when she found me it exacerbated my panic because I was convinced she would have to call an ambulance and they would put me away in a ward for people who broke their brains irreparably. If I had been alone maybe I would have killed myself from the hopelessness of it all.

>>11932
I think it's been proven psychedelics reduce brain activity (or possibly reroute it) so it's very possible you entered some weird realm of your thoughts. Then again some experiences are super random like people fighting with SoundCloud rappers or hallucinating bags of onions talking to them, some accurately produce near death experience results like tunnels, life reviews and seeing deceased loved ones

The funeral industry is exploitative and full of people using society's "don't talk about death" stigma to push Christian shit onto the dead even when they didn't follow that religion. I remember seeing a story of a taoist woman who was given a Catholic themed funeral, it's pretty clear this industry is full of some nasty behavior

>>11930
Relatives alone are responsible for carrying out the last will of the deceased. If relatives fail to do so, getting sent off according to local customs shouldn't come as surprise.