I made this post yesterday but I guess the janny deleted it. pls stop deleting my posts janny >>181373>It does not make sense because that would make men inferior in every single aspect of life.
No it wouldn't. Small men are superior to large men.
>The problem of smaller moids is that you would just turn half of population into undesirable inferior goblins.
This doesn't make sense. Compared to small men, large men are less healthy and contract almost all forms of cancer and disease at a far higher rate, they have a lower life expectancy, are inferior in fights with weapons and guns, require more food and energy, and the only benefit they get is being stronger at lifting weights which doesn't even grow in proportion to their size. Small men are stronger in proportion to their weight and height than large tall men are, and the small super athletic men are more than strong enough to do anything that's actually needed for society and civilization, and cost fewer resources and need less food.
>You need to give theme the edge in at least some aspects of life, and no, the immediate answer of making them hotter is not enough for working society.
They ARE given the edge by being smaller, it makes them healthier cuter live longer and be better in fights. You're thinking under the assumption that being bigger is an edge for men but it isn't, men aren't the females of the species.
Men should be ~4'/120cm and quick and athletic and agile, women should be 6'5"/195cm and thick with big hips and gestate litters of 3 or 4 babies each pregnancy. It's the optimal form and what we're going to genetically engineer humans to become in a few years.