/b/ - Random

Oreos are demonic:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/J6ff1rr5_Iw

Oreos are good. I eat them every now and then.

>>315754
…huh?

A monkey.

Like andrew hussie mashed up with the final boss of dragon quest 2. It wasn't adequate

buff bear kemomimi

a lady with long hair, wavy and down to her ankles

people care too much about the rights and dignity of male offenders, that's why. the article you included says
>The surgery is irreversible, disfiguring, and can cause feelings of humiliation and a lack of dignity. These harms arguably make it cruel and unusual punishment.
you know what's humiliating and un-dignifying? sexual abuse & harassment. cruel? objectification & degradation through a provocative/sexual context. but the mere THOUGHT that male offenders would be punished duly for it is what gets people squirming. the world truly isn't ready to care about women enough, not at all

but from a different perspective, breeding is integral to a lot of people's inherent sense of purpose, so permanently removing someone's ability to have children; even consensually, forever; is too far when the alternative chemical castration exists. if having kids wasn't so precious to people, even going so far as to let severely disabled people reproduce and torture their children with a painful existence, then we'd maybe have a shot.

It's kind of like death penalty, the verdict may not necessarily be correct but by then the changes are irreversible.
Not saying whether this should or should not be implemented but this would be one of the counter arguments.

and it's so irritating because when i bring this up in debates or just conversations they always say it could "ruin a man's life" & what if she's lying? Sure, those are real things that could happen but just because of that small % of women who do, victims can't get the justice they need !!!

This is why I always believe the victim first tbh.. then continue to update my opinion as more evidence comes out.
Victims are already scared enough to come out about what happened to them.

>>325778
Moids unironically cite fake stats like up to half of sa allegations are fabricated. I see them actually saying this shit. Or misinterpreting the stats and thinking because only a few cases get convictions they’re the only real ones.

>>325779

very true.
need to figure out a way to derail these fake stats. but i feel like its hard to change a moids mind if you are not a fellow moid. we could bring up the most logical arguments but will only respect it if a moid says the same thing.

offer a reward, ez

>>325762
What kind of reward? What if he thought my friend would not give it to him afterwards

>>325763
she should know her nigel well enough to concoct a personalised and effective bribe

>>325753
I don't understand this video and post. How do you get your boyfriend to wear an outfit you like, well why not just ask him? Is there like a punchline or some other meaningful subtext in the video or is that literally just it?

>>221872
that’s just tone policing

https://philosophicalvegan.com/wiki/index.php/NameTheTrait

i'm a meat-eater thanks to cognitive dissonance and a lack of self control

>>325759
try psychedelics

>>325764
which

>>325766
DMT

If you want a legal one https://karmaiq.com/

Studies show it boosts empathy long term

>>325755
Can you imagine spending so much time out of your life stressing over weight? What a sad existence

once, it was harder to gain weight, so it was seen as desirable. now, it's easier to gain weight because intensive workout routines require time, a good diet which can be expensive, and the right circumstances overall with work + other life commitments. nit-picking your body to achieve all of the listed things is a much more accessible fixation for women with money, intensified by access to a surgeon and liposuction. so, it's rarer. it becomes in fashion, because having a good enough situation to workout and eat well is a sign of wealth. the rich like to do anything that makes them distinct from the poor. that's why "homely" women, lower class, are depicted as fatter and less refined in film stereotypes, more sunken in. wider, larger tits. excessive, like they have no finetuning or self control. curvy women are associated with being bangmaids too.
it's a general lack of proper appreciation for the real female form basically. people want "better" versions, not real life

If liberty will continue to exist, it's up to us to spread freedom.

Patriots must be absolutely obsessive about telling people about freedom now.

The globalists want to kill you.

>>324272
why is the witch so ugly

>>324832
I got lazy by the end of it

Americans say that concentration camps could never possibly exist in the future because concentration camps never existed in the past.

I checked out lainchan this morning, I used to avoid it because of how troony the name felt to me, but its actually got some quality discussion. They also have a gardening general on /diy/! I should pay a visit sometime soon.

>>317992
I have been reading internet pages since about 2006 when Wikipedia was the big novelty and most chans were in their developmental stage
There was some seriously funny and seriously screwed up stuff altogether
Those strange memes, Advice Animals, Tubgirl, 2 girls 1 cup, Mr. Hands, all that sexually offensive stuff, creepy stuff, copypastas
A serious case of a stalker in California who was causing pretty serious trouble to various women and who got arrested various times
Another guy in California who got arrested after making threats to an online dictionary website
Underage stuff appreciators who had their own wiki and chat rooms
The whole 5 guys burger and fries thing with the Gamergate
The Nungesser-Sulkowicz story
Strange times
You could argue about the enshittification of the internet but overall I think things have improved, even if they're more boring now

Back in the day we used to post desu habeeb it

>>318011
Foul Bachelorette Frog

>>317992
Social media used to be just who you followed and that's it. Maybe you'd be suggested friends of friends but generally you only saw what you subscribed to. Uploading photos was already slow, not to mention videos, so people expressed themselves differently and having a lot of photos of yourself on your profile was weird. Nowadays seeing people upload videos about random topics and inserting their faces at any cost is so strange to me. Even on youtube you couldn't upload videos longer than a few minutes. So the content was overall more light-hearted and random.
Prior to social media, people just had their own websites and you had to manually visit them one by one and leave comments in a guest book. So basically the concept of virality was not really there. If you had a few thousand followers that was already a LOT.

The internet was a specific place you went to and left. A lot of people just had 1 family computer they shared and took turns using and in my early days you even had to pay per minute of internet access. Without smartphone internet, it was much easier to leave the internet behind and do other stuff and it was harder to get addicted. People couldn't take photos of you at school or in the street because rarely did anyone bring a digital camera with them. Editing photos was hard and required special software and skills so the photos you saw were either way more authentic or they were shooped to such hilarious degrees you could tell from a mile away. Automatic filters or even video filters did simply not exist. Privacy was a much bigger concern, I already mentioned that people had much fewer photos of themselves online, but before Facebook it was unimaginable to put your full government name on the internet. So you'd have your nickname and an avatar and the large-scale exposure and harassment that's normal now was basically impossible.

i find myself questioning what it's like for other people to inhabit their own heads, sometimes. not even the brain, not primarily, but the head. the feeling of focusing attention inside of it. because i don't really feel "in" my brain, but it's the only spot i can approximate myself being. i feel this somethingness, but this nothingness
how does life happen and come into other people? as in how it's processed. i'm nosey to know how far people go with integrating information into themselves, too, because nothing seems to permeate throughout me as it comes in. i rarely feel "one with" my crying, for example. i assume i'm indifferent overall
do people sense their head area as fuzzy? vague, foggy, rounded? or sharp, driven by clarity, jumpy, loud, listening? my head seems casual, low
i'm spitting nonsense atp but, i want to keep going. how many people have their attention, themselves, mostly in their hands? i think i'm somewhere at the crown of my skull, then i sense just above my glabella and onto my forehead. around that area
is existing inside ones own body vastly different for everyone, or generally similar? you'd imagine most people are in the top of their body, but what if someone's in their chest

Not sure about rolling on a 0 pph board but I want to fuck gholdengo

Rolling

Give me something not shit

something cute please

>>325731
i'd say you got a cute one, right?

“…words have been all my life, all my life–this need is like the Spider's need who carries before her a huge Burden of Silk which she must spin out–the silk is her life, her home, her safety–her food and drink too–and if it is attacked or pulled down, why, what can she do but make more, spin afresh, design anew….”

“Think of this - that the writer wrote alone, and the reader read alone, and they were alone with each other.”

"Las mujeres por su sexo, los hombres por su trabajo"

(I'm sure I wrote it incorrectly, :,3)

>>325720
I sense a profound implication in that one, something about fiction and reality being interdependent, something about life becoming an abstraction, idk.