[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Email will be public
Subject
Message

*Text* => Text

**Text** => Text

***Text*** => Text

[spoiler]Text[/spoiler] => Text

Image
Direct Link
Options NSFW image
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog


Check the Catalog before making a new thread.
Do not respond to maleposters. See Rule 7.
Please read the rules! Last update: 04/27/2021

15523621_H23918740…

Anonymous Admin 39516[Reply]

Do not make threads about the following topics or you will be banned for 7 days:

NEW: Low-effort threads without original input or elaboration, e.g. "What is your opinion of XYZ?" "Honest thoughts on [topic]" or memes/videos posted with "what do you think about this?"
- Race/Ethnicity/Nationality (including stereotypes & preferences)
- Religion
- "femboys"
- (Why) do guys…
- (Why) do you like guys who [insert preference here]
- (Why) do guys like [insert preference here]
- how to get a bf/gf/platonic friend (who does xyz)
- Fetish bait threads (if you must make a fetish thread, do it in >>>/nsfw/ and don't make it an image dump)
- Discord

If you want to talk about Radfem/TERF/Gendercritical themes, do not make a new thread. Use the existing threads and keep discussion civil. You can read my thoughts on a radfem board here: >>>/meta/2962

General threads:

>>117636 Pinkpill general/complaints about men as a whole
>>44115 Where/how to meet men
>>118214 Trans general
>>114365 TERF Memes/shittalking


b7f556b38b8ede0a17…

Anonymous 323424[Reply]

If you think about it, abortion is actually pretty trad. There's this meme that abortion is the modern woman's sin, yet, it was a normal practice in the past.

>The Stoics believed the fetus to be plantlike in nature, and not an animal until the moment of birth, when it finally breathed air. They therefore found abortion morally acceptable.[19][39]


>Aristotle wrote that, "[T]he line between lawful and unlawful abortion will be marked by the fact of having sensation and being alive."[40] Before that point was reached, Aristotle did not regard abortion as the killing of something human.


>In the Roman Republic and Principate, abortion was punished only when it violated the father's right to make decisions about rearing his offspring.[18]: 3  The Stoics did not view the fetus as a person, and the Romans did not punish abortion as homicide.


The Christian world generally condemned this act but did not really punish it harshly.
>But church councils, such as those of Elvira and Ancyra, which were called to specify the legal groundwork for Christian communities, outlined penalties only for those women who committed abortion after a sexual crime such as adultery or prostitution.
>Several historians have written that prior to the 19th century most Catholic authors did not regard termination of pregnancy before "quickening" or "ensoulment" as an abortion.

Fast forward to modernity:

>Social attitudes towards abortion shifted in the context of a backlash against the women's rights movement.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
35 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

Anonymous 324448

>>324447
That's a pretty good example of a frivolous abortion, considering they intended to go through birth anyway kek. Though I guess there's a bit of nuance between that and not wanting a kid period because you can barely feed or take care of yourself, for instance. (not making any argument for or against just making a distinction)

Anonymous 324559

>>324447
Or maybe that has to deal with the rampant misogyny in both countries.
>aborting girl children before they’re even born
That's how abortion works? You can't abort a two month old

Anonymous 324560

>>324559
You can even abort children post natally

Anonymous 324589

>>324560
Elaborate

Anonymous 324591

>>324559
>misogyny is when you can't abort
i know you think that sounds good but, it does not



1780488600199315.p…

Anonymous 324588[Reply]

Who are your favorite female protagonists?

Anonymous 324590

>>324588
i know you are a guy posting here to ragebait but no women ever cared nor played god of war.
You are looking at trannies pretending to be women mostly on twitter.



IMG_5097.jpeg

wanting to pursue zoology, is it worth it? Anonymous 324587[Reply]

are there any nonas here who have a degree working with animals? i would like to ask here instead of reddit, i have always felt super connected with animals and zoology and as i get older i feel like its my calling. but with the current state of the world is it even worth it? i wanted to know if it was worth it to just start volunteering before i join any class or school for it


1779272216098.jpg

Will he come back Anonymous 324586[Reply]

Will he hold his promise?


images (32).jpeg

Me Anonymous 323035[Reply]

I just fell asleep 3 hours ago I hate the feeling of waking up after afternoon nap
75 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

Anonymous 324535

photo_2026-06-03_0…

Happy pridemonth.

Anonymous 324542

Scientific Journals should start making youtube videos with summaries of their papers so I could watch them in the background and they could get money from the ads or something

Anonymous 324555

Idk how to feel about certain "doctors" and "experts" like naturopaths.
It feels like they're trying to make themselves appear more legitimate than they are. At best they're unqualified citizen researchers and at worst scammers.
But I also see some interesting topics brought up by them.

Anonymous 324558

someone tripped the fire alarm again im going insane

Anonymous 324585

actor-cat-cute-dar…

ok im going to sleep



IMG_20260603_19401…

Anonymous 324489[Reply]

Banff serving house prices all day?
Let's peep this out.
38 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

Anonymous 324547

>the mountain I will be crossing
Is this part of his ERP

Anonymous 324548

I think I like the flamish and german men the most

Anonymous 324549

I remember when I was 6 I saw plane trails in the sky and asked my grandma if those are for the trains in Heaven.

Anonymous 324583

20260604_224250.jp…

I grow hair on my tear trough

Anonymous 324584

>>324583
whitey



IMG_1152.jpeg

MGM VS FGM Anonymous 324567[Reply]

There’s documented cases of people getting hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions of dollars because of emotional damage, mental anguish and stuff when they dropped a chicken nugget on themselves or had non consensual sex even if there was no significant irreversible permanent physical injury. Why not circumcision reparations for baby boys mutilated right after birth?

All men who were circumcised as babies deserve at least 10 million USA dollars. Also remember even if each man deserves a few million or more and the docs hospitals nurses etc don’t have enough money they can just take all money and assets from them and distribute them equally among victims
They were innocent babies and were horribly, permanently and irreversibly mutilated for their entire one life on earth before it even began.
There is NO way to FULLY or even MOSTLY recover their lost foreskins and all of it's structures. Stretching does not nearly even come close to restoring it to it's original form.

>Why at least 10 million usa dollars?


Because there was a case of a adult man who merely had some mean words, drawings and jokes said to him at work. Nothing criminally illegal like death threats, leaking his social security number etc. He later quit his job at Tesla he wasn't fired. He was offered 15 million 2022 dollars for his hurt feelings by a usa judge https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/tesla-racism-lawsuit-worker-rejects-15-million-payout-rcna34655
He was literally offered 15 million dollars that the government would take from Tesla and hand directly to him. He rejected it because he wanted more then 15 million 2022 dollars but the point stands the government is willing to say mean words and hurt feelings are worth at least 15 million 2022 dollars.
Being circumcised as a baby is AT LEAST ten times worse so a mere ten million dollars per mutilated at birth man is already a deep deep compromise.

CASE #2

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2023/07/20/mcdonalds-lawsuit-hot-chicken-nugget/70436203007/
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
9 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

Anonymous 324577

>>324576
idk im orthodox

Anonymous 324578

>>324577
Fair enough. But Catholicism is probably false and Protestantism is not and Catholic countries have low circumcision rates so God isn’t punishing them

I think there really are a great many powerful arguments against Catholicism. Dustin Crummett https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEKpYouT1wU [Open] has a good video going over some of the problems, but to summarize some of the issues:

1 Catholics are committed to a really implausible view https://wollenblog.substack.com/p/catholic-sexual-morality-a-new-theory about sexual ethics, according to which homosexuality, masturbation, and contraception are immoral on account of being intrinsically disordered. The backdrop natural law view that this relies on is about as implausible as any view in all of philosophy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPen831EkYg [Open]

2 They’re similarly committed to a categorical prohibition on lying. This is insane! Lying is great and you should do it all the time! https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/the-lowdown-on-lying

Anonymous 324580

3 Catholics probably have to believe in an eternal hell, which strikes me as very implausible. https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2020/08/popes-creeds-councils-and-catechisms.html
https://benthams.substack.com/p/should-believers-in-eternal-hell?utm_source=publication-search
https://benthams.substack.com/p/universalism-a-comprehensive-defense?utm_source=publication-search
https://benthams.substack.com/p/why-i-disagree-with-gavin-ortlund?utm_source=publication-search

4 Catholics are committed to scriptural inerrancy. https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2020/08/popes-creeds-councils-and-catechisms.html I think the bible is riddled with clear errors concerning morality (e.g. pretty much the entire book of Joshua, stuff about slavery), authorship (it seems to affirm the false doctrine of mosaic authorship), and more. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLe1tMOs8ARn3Uy9dvxyqhBvEldBgkqtN5 When reading the Bible, it seems riddled with nutty holdovers of a barbaric and prescientific age, as well as contradictions and duplicate stories. https://benthams.substack.com/p/50-lifetimes-to-babylon?utm_source=publication-search
https://benthams.substack.com/p/why-im-not-a-christian?utm_source=publication-search

5 Catholics must believe in divine simplicity which I think is very implausible https://www.youtube.com/watchPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Anonymous 324581

interesting

Anonymous 324582

By listingthem, we decree and declare that all the faithful of both sexes mustregard them as condemned, reprobated, and rejected . . . We restrainall in the virtue of holy obedience and under the penalty of anautomatic major excommunication."

This seems to meet the requirements for an Ex Cathedra statements which are nicely summarized by Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility#:~:text=the%20Roman%20Pontiff%20(the%20Pope,is%20outside%20the%20Catholic%20Church.

According to the teaching of the First Vatican Council https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Vatican_Council and Catholic tradition, the conditions required for ex cathedra papal teaching are as follows:[12]

1 the Roman Pontiff (the Pope alone or with the College of Bishops) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_of_Bishops

2 speaks ex cathedra – that is, when (in the discharge of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, and by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostles_in_the_New_Testament he defines a doctrine:

A. concerning faith or morals, and

B. To be held by the whole Church.

The terminology of a definitive decree usually makes clear that this last condition is fulfilled, as through a formula such as "By the authority of Our Lord Jesus Christ and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, and by Our own authority, We declare, pronounce and define the doctrine […] to be revealed by God and as such to be firmly and immutably held by all the faithful," or through an accompanying anathema https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anathema stating that anyone who deliberately dissents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissent is outside the Catholic Church
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.



everything.png

Anonymous 324539[Reply]

I'm an in….cel mo…..id and I come everyday to this website to go……..on to your shi……….tty threads. I have an impr………egnation fet……..ish if that matters to anyone.

Anonymous 324540

are you having a stroke

Anonymous 324550

>>324540
It's to evade the wordfilters sis.

Anonymous 324552

>>324550
write rblox but replace with an o it will be funny

Anonymous 324562

Yeah it's going up

Anonymous 324565

begging for attention like the virgin whore you are. here, have it



Pieter_Bruegel_the…

Language Learning Anonymous 256547[Reply]

Any nonas learning languages? I'm learning Latin right now.
82 posts and 18 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

Anonymous 323517

IMG_1243.jpeg

Kek

Anonymous 323526

Screenshot_53.png

Newborns can distinguish the sounds of every language on Earth, about 600 consonants and 200 vowels, but by their first birthday, their brain has already filtered out sounds not used in their native language, making foreign accents almost inevitable for adult learners.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC166444/
>In two studies, we investigate the necessary and sufficient conditions for reversing this decline in foreign-language phonetic perception

Anonymous 324110

feiku.png

feiku nyuusu

Anonymous 324111


Anonymous 324564

1727889094249736.p…

Duolingo gave me free super for 3 days and the Lilly videocalls are actually way more useful than I thought



Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Rules / FAQ ] [ meta / b / media / img / feels / hb / x ]