>>318829
>You can, but why would you?
Proximity and ease of access to the amenities, shops, etc. I am not an expert but I assume you can reach any point of the city through the sewer system. A train tunnel is probably worse in that regard. Still, an interesting alternative.

>>318832
You don't mind the smell and the illnesses?

>>318867
Our ancestors had to tolerate horrible smells and diseases for millenia. It's time to return to tradition.

>>318872
Starting from man swamp ass?

If there's an apocalypse and most people die you have the opportunity to influence the culture by just completely making shit up. So there's something to look forward to after WW3.

>>319086
but when you do date a non-misogynist gynophile moid with a pretty personality, he'll be like that for a reason. he'll be traumatised, or a pedo, or a communist, or insane. and if you're too bland yourself to deal with that shit, back to dating the grey.

>>319097
Oh no you dont seem to get it. Nature is like that for a reason, i totally get why in nature the female is dull and the male is beautiful. Its guaranteed to go back to that because women make a huge effort to filter out most moids anyway. Like they make huge insane efforts to avoid moids and moid attention because the cost of their bullshit is too high, the cost of pregnancy is too high. It just makes complete sense to me in the grand scheme of things. Now you have women who dont have to anticipate being trapped in marriage or forced to have 30 kids anymore. What do you get? Huge decline in birthrates (Not reproducing with men that forced them to) Its the way the big circle turns honestly. And now so much media is geared toward the female gaze, where it never was before. I think you get my drift.

>>319099
the female gaze is a misnomer. we have only the particular gaze of particular women. the male gaze was coined to explain the convergence of the gaze of male character, male audience, and male director in film: convergence of misogynist ideology and misogynist practice. in female-oriented media, this simply doesnt happen. instead, we see particular male gazes arranged for presentation to a female audience.

>>319100
…but maybe the recent discourse about "female gaze" is starting to consitute a female gaze proper, even if it doesn't describe one accurately. i'm not sure.

>>319100
Nah we don't. If you weren't brainwashed or harrassed into looking at stereotypical bland masculinity, beauty is beauty. See east asian male beauty for example. Even in Europe stereotypically attractive men all have a soft look to them, they aren't like american men. Half of women are intimidated and bullied into looking at stereotypical masculinity because it makes men feel like they're keeping and asserting dominance, where they don't have to do extra work for sex, instead women do. Its not more complicated than that. I'm seriously done with larpers trying to flip the script, profess they aren't brainwashed, they just like fat balding hairy men… All for the sake of diluting and confusing the conversation at the expense of truth. They're just making it complicated on purpose because they don't want to give up gender roles they've been fed all their lives. You need to stop letting men and gendercrazed saboteurs feed you this bs, its a psyop.

Watch 10 Years Of Trump Promising Not to Start New Wars.

Americans laugh when New York outlaws ketchup, but do you think ketchup bans in New York might lead to ketchup bans in Vermont and Kansas?

Do you think ketchup bans might lead to mustard bans and toothpick bans?

Do you think that the Satanists are going wake up and restore the Bill of Rights, decrease the debt, or end the wars?

Does anyone see what is going on?

>>319038
MAGAs actually voted against new wars, that's the funny part.

>>319096
"But I still support Trump."

Apparently one of the witchan anons who's been posting in the vent thread on /txt/ is obsessed with the character Hazel from the fairly oddparents spinoff and thinks that when they die they'll be in a relationship with Hazel in the afterlife. This has gotten so far as for this person to send racist emails harassing Hazel's voice actress

>>319082
Mentally ill personalityfags on imageboards isn't breaking news

I made this collage of the person losing it about Hazel for Lolcow and goddamn it, I'm not letting it go to waste

>>319082
Im not racist, I already explained it :(

based

bump

again

>>312473
Shits up again

bump

Damn it!

So where are the promised Ovarit archives? https://substack.ovarit.com still shows nothing.

One thing worse than living in a police state is finding out that no one cares.

Americans say live and let live and then turn around and scream hats must be banned.

Still no updates on the archive…

>>318794
A moid hatting himself for being a moid and blamming all the world's problems on moids being fine with being moids isn't feminism.

>XXX are not left-wing, they've betrayed leftism and become conservative and reactionary,
Remember, there are 100 issues and if you have a 10% disagreement over one of them, then you are the enemy and they will come for you. This isn't left or right, this is being antisocial. These people never cared about any of the causes they pretend to have, like those guys in Cuba right now they are pretending to have a cause to give weight to their voice.

How many of these feminists have revolted about the hundred of thousands of little girls being reduced to sexual slavery in England with the protection of the police and the social service? I guess not one of them did.

>I'm trying to see if there's any evidence of the labels left and right losing their ideological coherence.
The left used to want the workers to keep as much as the money they work for as possible, now they want to take everything and abolish work.
The right used to want worldwide free trade and are now hardcore protectionists.
The left used to be against religion and now they fight for Islam in the west.
The right used to want the people to be atomized individuals and now have a cringe thing for the culture that have been lost.
The left used to oppose immigration because it was a trick of the capitalists to break the working class and the right was for it because they want cheap labor.
I could continue for an entire hour.

>>318812
Well said and very true

>>318794
Feminism in general has historically been a movement based on leftist ideology and praxis, just applied to the material reality of women as a social caste. The modern left has prioritized trans rights to such an extreme degree that basic feminist ideology is no longer compatible with leftism. Why? Because "it makes trans women dysphoric."

That is, even acknowledging the bare minimum of feminist ideology– that women are oppressed based on their SEX–is considered transphobic by many modern "leftists." Acknowledging that socialization plays a HUGE rule as to why men and women of society engage in certain behaviors is considered "transphobic"–because how could a trans woman ever POSSIBLY be "socialized as male" if she was ALWAYS a woman?!

This leaves a lot of women who want to improve the material conditions of women without anywhere to land. In historical and analytical theory, many gender critical voices could be considered left wing (but not all; certainly depends on the focus of their activism.) In actuality, we're kind of forced into a no man's land socially and politically, because there isn't really any party other than feminists who gives two shits about women's' liberation from the current patriarchal systems.

Even TIFs have attempted to be vocal about this themselves as well, only to be shot down, harassed, and sent death threats, just like "TERFs" would. They're calling trans people TERFs for acknowledging that the TIMs who didn't transition until they were 29 were raised as men and have learned male behaviors and misogyny to unpack as a result of that.

>>318789
I'd consider myself post-right. Used to be alt-right, always and still of a libertarian/anarchist flavor

Are we allowed to request/post webms or gifs of women beating the shit out of men here?