>>335507im not the op, and you didnt answer my question. seducing in my words means to do things with the intention of making someone specific feel romantically attracted to you and tell them that you are romantically attracted to them. your idea of the ops posts definition is poor, is it seducing or manipulating to tell someone to bring an umbrella because it will rain? what if they wouldnt otherwise have brought one? i never mentioned grooming nor did i call anyone falling for bad men "the bad ones" (seriously? you even put that in quotes!). im asking for specific differences between seduction and your noncing
>>335466what do you mean by old sense of the word? do you mean how seduction happened back then versus how the grooming happens today? again that is what i was getting at with my comment. back then you were seduced by a dashing farmer or scholar, now you are groomed by an unemployed abuser. seducing doesnt mean that they will fall in love, but the intention is to make them fall in love, there is a difference.
and we have words like tricked for when someone is [trick/abus/manipulat/convinc]ed into joining a cult. also read what i will say to the post below yours for how i think for the rest of your post.
>>335507it is your fault how you react to your emotions. stop blaming moids and become self aware